Current status of laparoscopic emergency surgery in Korea: multicenter restrospective cohort study
- PMID: 37712310
- PMCID: PMC10505370
- DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.112
Current status of laparoscopic emergency surgery in Korea: multicenter restrospective cohort study
Abstract
Purpose: Laparoscopic surgery is a choice in several emergency settings. However, there has been no nationwide study or survey that has compared the clinical use of laparoscopic emergency surgery (LES) versus open abdominal emergency surgery (OES) in Korea. Therefore, we examined the state of LES across multiple centers in Korea and further compared this data with the global state based on published reports.
Methods: Data of 2,122 patients who received abdominal emergency surgery between 2014 and 2019 in three hospitals in Korea were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Several clinical factors were investigated and analyzed.
Results: Of the patients, 1,280 (60.3%) were in the OES group and 842 (39.7%) were in the LES group. The most commonly operated organ in OES was the small bowel (25.8%), whereas that for LES was the appendix. In appendectomy and cholecystectomy, 93.7% and 88.0% were in the LES group. In small bowel surgery, gastric surgery, and large bowel surgery, 89.4%, 92.0%, and 79.1% were in the OES group. The severity-related factors of patient status demonstrated statistically significant limiting factors of selection between LES and OES.
Conclusion: Although our study has several limitations, compared to the LES data from other countries, the general LES state was similar in appendectomies, cholecystectomies, and small bowel surgeries. However, in gastric and colorectal surgeries, the LES state was different from those of other countries. This study demonstrated the LES state and limiting factors of selection between LES and OES in various operated organs. Further studies are required to analyze these differences and the various limiting factors.
Keywords: Emergency; Laparoscopy; Surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures




Similar articles
-
[The influence of obesity on early results and quality of life of patients after chosen operations performed by laparoscopic or open methods].Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2007;53(3):119-27. Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2007. PMID: 18595494 Polish.
-
Laparoscopic surgery for common surgical emergencies: a population-based study.Surg Endosc. 2005 Jun;19(6):774-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9158-5. Epub 2005 May 4. Surg Endosc. 2005. PMID: 15868254
-
The use of emergency laparoscopy for acute abdomen in the elderly: the FRAILESEL Italian Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.Updates Surg. 2020 Jun;72(2):513-525. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00726-5. Epub 2020 Feb 22. Updates Surg. 2020. PMID: 32088854
-
[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].G Chir. 2001 Oct;22(10):353-7. G Chir. 2001. PMID: 11816948 Review. Italian.
-
Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in Brazil: current status and perspectives-a report from the Brazilian Laparoscopic Oncologic Gastrectomy Group (BLOGG).Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 May 12;2:45. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2017.03.17. eCollection 2017. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 28616601 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic emergency surgery in Korea: a comprehensive analysis of current practices.J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023 Dec 15;26(4):176-177. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.176. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023. PMID: 38098349 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Song MJ, Lee KM, Kim IB, et al. Acute care surgery model for emergency cholecystectomy. J Acute Care Surg. 2016;6:57–61. doi: 10.17479/jacs.2016.6.2.57. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources