Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 15:13:04101.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04101.

Understanding and reporting odds ratios as rate-ratio estimates in case-control studies

Affiliations

Understanding and reporting odds ratios as rate-ratio estimates in case-control studies

Steven Kerr et al. J Glob Health. .

Abstract

Background: We noted that there remains some confusion in the health-science literature on reporting sample odds ratios as estimated rate ratios in case-control studies.

Methods: We recap historical literature that definitively answered the question of when sample odds ratios (ORs) from a case-control study are consistent estimators for population rate ratios. We use numerical examples to illustrate the magnitude of the disparity between sample ORs in a case-control study and population rate ratios when sufficient conditions for them to be equal are not satisfied.

Results: We stress that in a case-control study, sampling controls from those still at risk at the time of outcome event of the index case is not sufficient for a sample OR to be a consistent estimator for an intelligible rate ratio. In such studies, constancy of the exposure prevalence together with constancy of the hazard ratio (HR) (i.e., the instantaneous rate ratio) over time is sufficient for this result if sampling time is not controlled; if time is controlled, constancy of the HR will suffice. We present numerical examples to illustrate how failure to satisfy these conditions adds a small systematic error to sample ORs as estimates of population rate ratios.

Conclusions: We recommend that researchers understand and critically evaluate all conditions used to interpret their estimates as consistent for a population parameter in case-control studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of interest: The authors completed the ICMJE Disclosure of Interest Form (available upon request from the corresponding author) and declare the following activities and relationships: AS and CR are members of the Scottish Government’s CMO COVID-19 Advisory Group. IR is a member of the Croatian Government’s Scientific Committee on COVID-19 and co-Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Global Health. AS and CR are members of NERVTAG’s risk stratification subgroup. CR is a member of SPI-M. AS is a member of AstraZeneca’s Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Advisory Group and the Scottish Government’s Standing Committee on Pandemics. All roles are unremunerated. All other co-authors report no conflict of interests.

References

    1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. (2008). Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    1. Greenland S, Thomas DC.On the need for the rare disease assumption in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;116:547-53. Erratum in: Am J Epidemiol 1990 Jun;131(6): 1102. PMID: 7124721. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113439 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Breslow NE, Day NE.Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I – The analysis of case-control studies. IARC Sci Publ. 1980;(32):5-338. - PubMed
    1. Rudan I, Millington T, Antal K, Grange Z, Fenton L, Sullivan C, et al. BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination uptake, safety, effectiveness and waning in children and young people aged 12-17 years in Scotland. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022;23:100513. 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100513 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Labrecque JA, Hunink MMG, Ikram MA, Ikram MK.Do Case-Control Studies Always Estimate Odds Ratios? Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190:318-21. 10.1093/aje/kwaa167 - DOI - PMC - PubMed