Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 15;18(9):e0291627.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291627. eCollection 2023.

The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review

Amanda Jane Blatch-Jones  1 , Alejandra Recio Saucedo  1 , Beth Giddins  1
Affiliations

The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review

Amanda Jane Blatch-Jones et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Preprints are open and accessible scientific manuscript or report that is shared publicly, through a preprint server, before being submitted to a journal. The value and importance of preprints has grown since its contribution during the public health emergency of the COVID-19 pandemic. Funders and publishers are establishing their position on the use of preprints, in grant applications and publishing models. However, the evidence supporting the use and acceptability of preprints varies across funders, publishers, and researchers. The scoping review explored the current evidence on the use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings by publishers, funders, and the research community throughout the research lifecycle.

Methods: A scoping review was undertaken with no study or language limits. The search strategy was limited to the last five years (2017-2022) to capture changes influenced by COVID-19 (e.g., accelerated use and role of preprints in research). The review included international literature, including grey literature, and two databases were searched: Scopus and Web of Science (24 August 2022).

Results: 379 titles and abstracts and 193 full text articles were assessed for eligibility. Ninety-eight articles met eligibility criteria and were included for full extraction. For barriers and challenges, 26 statements were grouped under four main themes (e.g., volume/growth of publications, quality assurance/trustworthiness, risks associated to credibility, and validation). For benefits and value, 34 statements were grouped under six themes (e.g., openness/transparency, increased visibility/credibility, open review process, open research, democratic process/systems, increased productivity/opportunities).

Conclusions: Preprints provide opportunities for rapid dissemination but there is a need for clear policies and guidance from journals, publishers, and funders. Cautionary measures are needed to maintain the quality and value of preprints, paying particular attention to how findings are translated to the public. More research is needed to address some of the uncertainties addressed in this review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow diagram of the included articles.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Benefits and value statements grouped under six themes and challenges and barriers statements grouped under four themes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sever R, Eisen M, Inglis J. Plan u: Universal access to scientific and medical research via funder preprint mandates. PloS Biol. 2019;17(6). doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000273 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Council COPE. COPE Discussion document: Preprints. March 2018.
    1. Pearse RM, Ackland GL, Asai T, Hemmings HC Jr. Preprints in perioperative medicine: immediacy for the greater good. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126(5):915–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.02.024 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodríguez EG. Preprints and preprint servers as academic communication tools. Revista Cubana de Informacion en Ciencias de la Salud. 2019;30(1):e1324–e.
    1. Kaiser DE, Oliveira Crossetti MdG. Open Science and the emergence of preprints. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2021;42:e20210030. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2021.20210030 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types