Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 15;102(37):e35057.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035057.

A model study for the classification of high-risk groups for cardiac arrest in general ward patients using simulation techniques

Affiliations

A model study for the classification of high-risk groups for cardiac arrest in general ward patients using simulation techniques

Seok Young Song et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

Currently, many hospitals use vital signs-based criteria such as modified early warning score (MEWS) and national early warning score (NEWS) to classify high-risk patients for cardiac arrest, but there are limitations in selecting high-risk patients with a possibility of cardiac arrest. The purpose of this study is to develop a cardiac arrest classification model to identify patients at high risk of cardiac arrest based on the patient family and past history, and blood test results after hospitalization, rather than vital signs. This study used electronic medical record (EMR) data from A university hospital, and patients in the high-risk group for cardiac arrest were defined as those who underwent cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after cardiac arrest. Considering the use of the rapid response team of A university hospital, patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICU), emergency medicine departments, psychiatric departments, pediatric departments, cardiology departments, and palliative care wards were excluded. This study included 325,534 patients, of which 3291 low-risk and 382 high-risk patients were selected for study. Data were split into training and validation data sets and univariate analysis was performed for 13 candidate risk factors. Then, multivariate analysis was performed using a bivariate logistic regression model, and an optimal model was selected using simulation analysis. In the training data set, it was calculated as sensitivity 75.25%, precision 21.59%, specificity 66.89%, accuracy 67.79%, F1 score 33.56, area under curve (AUC) 71.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 68.9-73.1 P value=<.001). In the validation data set, sensitivity 73.37%, precision 25.81%, specificity 75.03%, accuracy 74.86%, F1 score 38.19, AUC 74.2 (95% CI = 72.1-76.2, P value=<.001) were calculated. A model for classifying the high-risk group of cardiac arrest should be developed from various perspectives. In the future, in order to classify patients with high risk of cardiac arrest, a prospective study on the combined use of the model developed by this study and NEWS or MEWS should be conducted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The process of setting the training data set and validation data set from the total number of patients.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
ROC in the training data set (A) and the validation data set (B) using the cardiac arrest risk classification model and the actual data. ROC = receiver operating characteristic.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Homsted L. Institute of Medicine report: to err is human: building a safer health care system. Fla Nurse. 2000;48:6. - PubMed
    1. Wilson RM, Harrison BT, Gibberd RW, et al. . An analysis of the causes of adverse events from the Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust. 1999;170:411–5. - PubMed
    1. Ryu S, Oh SK, Lee BK, et al. . A combination of the Modified Early Warning Score and the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale as a triage tool in patients with infection. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2023;10:60–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams B. The National Early Warning Score: from concept to NHS implementation. Clin Med (Lond). 2022;22:499–505. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lei M, Han Z, Wang S, et al. . A machine learning-based prediction model for in-hospital mortality among critically ill patients with hip fracture: an internal and external validated study. Injury. 2023;54:636–44. - PubMed