A model study for the classification of high-risk groups for cardiac arrest in general ward patients using simulation techniques
- PMID: 37713881
- PMCID: PMC10508528
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035057
A model study for the classification of high-risk groups for cardiac arrest in general ward patients using simulation techniques
Abstract
Currently, many hospitals use vital signs-based criteria such as modified early warning score (MEWS) and national early warning score (NEWS) to classify high-risk patients for cardiac arrest, but there are limitations in selecting high-risk patients with a possibility of cardiac arrest. The purpose of this study is to develop a cardiac arrest classification model to identify patients at high risk of cardiac arrest based on the patient family and past history, and blood test results after hospitalization, rather than vital signs. This study used electronic medical record (EMR) data from A university hospital, and patients in the high-risk group for cardiac arrest were defined as those who underwent cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after cardiac arrest. Considering the use of the rapid response team of A university hospital, patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICU), emergency medicine departments, psychiatric departments, pediatric departments, cardiology departments, and palliative care wards were excluded. This study included 325,534 patients, of which 3291 low-risk and 382 high-risk patients were selected for study. Data were split into training and validation data sets and univariate analysis was performed for 13 candidate risk factors. Then, multivariate analysis was performed using a bivariate logistic regression model, and an optimal model was selected using simulation analysis. In the training data set, it was calculated as sensitivity 75.25%, precision 21.59%, specificity 66.89%, accuracy 67.79%, F1 score 33.56, area under curve (AUC) 71.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 68.9-73.1 P value=<.001). In the validation data set, sensitivity 73.37%, precision 25.81%, specificity 75.03%, accuracy 74.86%, F1 score 38.19, AUC 74.2 (95% CI = 72.1-76.2, P value=<.001) were calculated. A model for classifying the high-risk group of cardiac arrest should be developed from various perspectives. In the future, in order to classify patients with high risk of cardiac arrest, a prospective study on the combined use of the model developed by this study and NEWS or MEWS should be conducted.
Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Derivation of a cardiac arrest prediction model using ward vital signs*.Crit Care Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):2102-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318250aa5a. Crit Care Med. 2012. PMID: 22584764 Free PMC article.
-
Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and the Modified Early Warning Score for Predicting Clinical Deterioration in General Ward Patients Regardless of Suspected Infection.J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Apr 25;37(16):e122. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e122. J Korean Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 35470597 Free PMC article.
-
[Analysis of the factors influencing prognosis of the adult in-hospital cardiac arrest].Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):398-403. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230721-00538. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024. PMID: 38813635 Chinese.
-
[Prognostic value of hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio in patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest].Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Sep;35(9):958-962. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230207-00066. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023. PMID: 37803955 Chinese.
-
Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 20;8(8):CD007260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007260.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30125048 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Early introduction of simulation in the medical curriculum: the MedInTo perspective.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 4;10:1280592. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1280592. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38239607 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 5;103(27):e38813. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038813. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 38968472 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Homsted L. Institute of Medicine report: to err is human: building a safer health care system. Fla Nurse. 2000;48:6. - PubMed
-
- Wilson RM, Harrison BT, Gibberd RW, et al. . An analysis of the causes of adverse events from the Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust. 1999;170:411–5. - PubMed
-
- Lei M, Han Z, Wang S, et al. . A machine learning-based prediction model for in-hospital mortality among critically ill patients with hip fracture: an internal and external validated study. Injury. 2023;54:636–44. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous