Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 37714082
- PMCID: PMC10885629
- DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104894
Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Human behavior and more specifically behavioral insight-based approaches to vaccine uptake have often been overlooked. While there have been a few narrative reviews indexed in Medline on behavioral interventions to increase vaccine uptake, to our knowledge, none have been systematic reviews and meta-analyses covering not just high but also low-and-middle income countries.
Methods: We included 613 studies from the Medline database in our systematic review and meta-analysis categorizing different behavioral interventions in 9 domains: education campaigns, on-site vaccination, incentives, free vaccination, institutional recommendation, provider recommendation, reminder and recall, message framing, and vaccine champion. Additionally, considering that there is variability in the acceptance of vaccines among different populations, we assessed studies from both high-income countries (HICs) and low- to middle-income countries (LMICs), separately.
Findings: Our results showed that behavioral interventions can considerably improve vaccine uptake in most settings. All domains that we examined improved vaccine uptake with the highest effect size associated with provider recommendation (OR: 3.4 (95%CI: 2.5-4.6); Domain: motivation) and on-site vaccination (OR: 2.9 (95%CI: 2.3-3.7); Domain: practical issues). While the number of studies conducted in LMICs was smaller, the quality of studies was similar with those conducted in HICs. Nevertheless, there were variations in the observed effect sizes.
Interpretation: Our findings indicate that "provider recommendation" and "on-site vaccination" along with other behavioral interventions can be employed to increase vaccination rates globally.
Keywords: Behavioral interventions; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Vaccine uptake.
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest None.
Figures
References
-
- WHO. Immunization. World Health Organ. 2019; published online Dec 5. https://www.who.int/news-room/facts-in-pictures/detail/immunization (accessed Nov 29, 2019).
-
- Organization WH. 2018 assessment report of the Global Vaccine Action Plan: strategic advisory group of experts on immunization. World Health Organization, 2018.
-
- Organization WH, European Commission. Global Vaccination Summit Background Paper Roundtable 1, In vaccines we trust: stepping up action to increase vaccine confidence. 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/vaccination/docs/ev_20190... (accessed Nov 29, 2019).
-
- Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Rothman AJ, Leask J, Kempe A. Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action. Psychol Sci Public Interest J Am Psychol Soc 2017; 18: 149–207. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
