Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Nov:137:104894.
doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104894. Epub 2023 Sep 4.

Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Amyn A Malik et al. Health Policy. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Human behavior and more specifically behavioral insight-based approaches to vaccine uptake have often been overlooked. While there have been a few narrative reviews indexed in Medline on behavioral interventions to increase vaccine uptake, to our knowledge, none have been systematic reviews and meta-analyses covering not just high but also low-and-middle income countries.

Methods: We included 613 studies from the Medline database in our systematic review and meta-analysis categorizing different behavioral interventions in 9 domains: education campaigns, on-site vaccination, incentives, free vaccination, institutional recommendation, provider recommendation, reminder and recall, message framing, and vaccine champion. Additionally, considering that there is variability in the acceptance of vaccines among different populations, we assessed studies from both high-income countries (HICs) and low- to middle-income countries (LMICs), separately.

Findings: Our results showed that behavioral interventions can considerably improve vaccine uptake in most settings. All domains that we examined improved vaccine uptake with the highest effect size associated with provider recommendation (OR: 3.4 (95%CI: 2.5-4.6); Domain: motivation) and on-site vaccination (OR: 2.9 (95%CI: 2.3-3.7); Domain: practical issues). While the number of studies conducted in LMICs was smaller, the quality of studies was similar with those conducted in HICs. Nevertheless, there were variations in the observed effect sizes.

Interpretation: Our findings indicate that "provider recommendation" and "on-site vaccination" along with other behavioral interventions can be employed to increase vaccination rates globally.

Keywords: Behavioral interventions; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Vaccine uptake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Studies included and excluded at each stage of review process.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Forrest Plot showing ORs and respective 95% CIs for all studies included in the meta-analysis by domains
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Forrest Plot showing ORs and respective 95% CIs for all studies from LMICs included in the meta-analysis by domains
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Forrest Plot showing ORs and respective 95% CIs for all RCTs included in the meta-analysis by domains
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Forrest Plot showing ORs and respective 95% CIs for all high-GRADE studies included in the meta-analysis by domains

References

    1. WHO. Immunization. World Health Organ. 2019; published online Dec 5. https://www.who.int/news-room/facts-in-pictures/detail/immunization (accessed Nov 29, 2019).
    1. Organization WH. 2018 assessment report of the Global Vaccine Action Plan: strategic advisory group of experts on immunization. World Health Organization, 2018.
    1. Phillips DE, Dieleman JL, Lim SS, Shearer J. Determinants of effective vaccine coverage in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and interpretive synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17: 681. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Organization WH, European Commission. Global Vaccination Summit Background Paper Roundtable 1, In vaccines we trust: stepping up action to increase vaccine confidence. 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/vaccination/docs/ev_20190... (accessed Nov 29, 2019).
    1. Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Rothman AJ, Leask J, Kempe A. Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action. Psychol Sci Public Interest J Am Psychol Soc 2017; 18: 149–207. - PubMed

Publication types