Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Nov;37(11):8384-8393.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10361-x. Epub 2023 Sep 15.

Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in obese patients

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in obese patients

Fabio Ausania et al. Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Although robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) has a lower conversion rate to open surgery and causes less blood loss than laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), clear evidence on the impact of the surgical approach on morbidity is lacking. Prior studies have shown a higher rate of complications among obese patients undergoing pancreatectomy. The primary aim of this study is to compare short-term outcomes of RDP vs. LDP in patients with a BMI ≥ 30.

Methods: In this multicenter study, all obese patients who underwent RDP or LDP for any indication between 2012 and 2022 at 18 international expert centers were included. The baseline characteristics underwent inverse probability treatment weighting to minimize allocation bias.

Results: Of 446 patients, 219 (50.2%) patients underwent RDP. The median age was 60 years, the median BMI was 33 (31-36), and the preoperative diagnosis was ductal adenocarcinoma in 21% of cases. The conversion rate was 19.9%, the overall complication rate was 57.8%, and the 90-day mortality rate was 0.7% (3 patients). RDP was associated with a lower complication rate (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.89; p = 0.005), less blood loss (150 vs. 200 ml; p < 0.001), fewer blood transfusion requirements (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15-0.50; p < 0.001) and a lower Comprehensive Complications Index (8.7 vs. 8.9, p < 0.001) than LPD. RPD had a lower conversion rate (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.19-0.39; p < 0.001) and achieved better spleen preservation rate (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.13-3.39; p = 0.016) than LPD.

Conclusions: In obese patients, RDP is associated with a lower conversion rate, fewer complications and better short-term outcomes than LPD.

Keywords: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy; Left pancreatic resection; Obesity; Outcomes; Robotic distal pancreatectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Fabio Ausania, Filippo Landi, John B. Martinie, Dionisios Vrochides, Matthew Walsh, Shanaz M. Hossain, Steven White, Viswakumar Prabakaran, Laleh G. Melstrom, Yuman Fong, Giovanni Butturini, Laura Bignotto, Valentina Valle, Yuntao Bing, Dianrong Xiu, Gregorio Di Franco, Francisco Sanchez-Bueno, Nicola de'Angelis, Alexis Laurent, Giuseppe Giuliani, Graziano Pernazza, Alessandro Esposito, Roberto Salvia, Francesca Bazzocchi, Ludovica Esposito, Andrea Pietrabissa, Luigi Pugliese, Riccardo Memeo, Ichiro Uyama, Yuichiro Uchida, José Rios, Andrea Coratti, Luca Morelli and Pier C. Giulianotti have no conflicts of interest to declare or financial ties to disclose.

References

    1. De Rooij T, Van Hilst J, Van Santvoort H, Boerma D, Van Den Boezem P, Daams F, Van Dam R, Dejong C, Van Duyn E, Dijkgraaf M, Van Eijck C, Festen S, Gerhards M, Groot Koerkamp B, De Hingh I, Kazemier G, Klaase J, De Kleine R, Van Laarhoven C, Luyer M, Patijn G, Steenvoorde P, Suker M, Abu Hilal M, Busch O, Besselink M. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (Leopard) Ann Surg. 2019;269:2–9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002979. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Hilst J, De Rooij T, Klompmaker S, Rawashdeh M, Aleotti F, Al-Sarireh B, Alseidi A, Ateeb Z, Balzano G, Berrevoet F, Björnsson B, Boggi U, Busch OR, Butturini G, Casadei R, Del Chiaro M, Chikhladze S, Cipriani F, Van Dam R, Damoli I, Van Dieren S, Dokmak S, Edwin B, Van Eijck C, Fabre J-M, Falconi M, Farges O, Fernández-Cruz L, Forgione A, Frigerio I, Fuks D, Gavazzi F, Gayet B, Giardino A, Groot Koerkamp B, Hackert T, Hassenpflug M, Kabir I, Keck T, Khatkov I, Kusar M, Lombardo C, Marchegiani G, Marshall R, Menon KV, Montorsi M, Orville M, De Pastena M, Pietrabissa A, Poves I, Primrose J, Pugliese R, Ricci C, Roberts K, Røsok B, Sahakyan MA, Sánchez-Cabús S, Sandström P, Scovel L, Solaini L, Soonawalla Z, Souche FR, Sutcliffe RP, Tiberio GA, Tomazic A, Troisi R, Wellner U, White S, Wittel UA, Zerbi A, Bassi C, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (Diploma) Ann Surg. 2019;269:10–7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002561. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gavriilidis P, Roberts KJ, Sutcliffe RP. Comparison of robotic vs laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy. A systematic review and network meta-analysis. HPB. 2019;21:1268–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.04.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kamarajah SK, Sutandi N, Robinson SR, French JJ, White SA. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB. 2019;21:1107–18. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.02.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Müller PC, Breuer E, Nickel F, Zani S, Jr, Kauffmann E, De Franco L, Tschuor C, Suno Krohn P, Burgdorf SK, Jonas JP, Oberkofler CE, Petrowsky H, Saint-Marc O, Seelen L, Molenaar IQ, Wellner U, Keck T, Coratti A, Van Dam C, De Wilde R, Koerkamp BG, Valle V, Giulianotti P, Ghabi E, Moskal D, Lavu H, Vrochides D, Martinie J, Yeo C, Sánchez-Velázquez P, Ielpo B, Ajay P, Shah MM, Kooby DA, Gao S, Hao J, He J, Boggi U, Hackert T, Allen P, Borel-Rinkes IHM, Clavien PA. Robotic distal pancreatectomy, a novel standard of care? Benchmark values for surgical outcomes from 16 International Expert Centers. Ann Surg. 2022 doi: 10.1097/Sla0000000000005601. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types