Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;59 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e14232.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14232. Epub 2023 Sep 16.

Use of and barriers to adopting standardized social risk screening tools in federally qualified health centers during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic

Affiliations

Use of and barriers to adopting standardized social risk screening tools in federally qualified health centers during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic

Nicole C Giron et al. Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the national rate of social risk factor screening adoption among federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), examine organizational factors associated with social risk screening adoption, and identify barriers to utilizing a standardized screening tool in 2020.

Data source: 2020 Uniform Data System, a 100% sample of all US FQHCs (N = 1375).

Study design: We used multivariable linear probability models to assess the association between social risk screening adoption and key FQHC characteristics. We used descriptive statistics to describe variations in screening tool types and barriers to utilizing standardized tools. We thematically categorized open-ended responses about tools and barriers.

Data collection: None.

Principal findings: In 2020, 68.9% of FQHCs screened patients for any social risk factors. Characteristics associated with a greater likelihood of screening adoption included having high proportions of patients best served in a language other than English (18.8 percentage point [PP] increase, 95% CI: 6.0, 31.6) and being larger in size (10.3 PP increase, 95% CI: 0.7, 20.0). Having higher proportions of uninsured patients (14.2 PP decrease, 95% CI: -25.5, -0.3) and participating in Medicaid-managed care contracts (7.3 PP decrease, 95% CI: -14.2, -0.3) were associated with lower screening likelihood. Among screening FQHCs, the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients' Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE) was the most common tool (47.1%). Among non-screening FQHCs, common barriers to using a standardized tool included lack of staff training to discuss social issues (25.2%), inability to include screening in patient intake (21.7%), and lack of funding for addressing social needs (19.2%).

Conclusions: Though most FQHCs screened for social risk factors in 2020, various barriers have prevented nearly 1 in 3 FQHCs from adopting a screening tool. Policies that provide FQHCs with resources to support training and workflow changes may increase screening uptake and facilitate engagement with other sectors.

Keywords: cross-sector collaboration; federally qualified health centers; safety net; social determinants of health; social risk factor screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no other conflicts to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Use of screening tools among federally qualified health centers collecting social risk data (N = 947). Percentages do not add to 100% because federally qualified health centers were able to select multiple response options. ACO is an Accountable Care Organization. EHR is an electronic health record.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Barriers to using a standardized screening tool among federally qualified health centers not collecting social risk data (N = 428). Percentages do not add to 100% because federally qualified health centers were able to select multiple response options.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brakefield WS, Olusanya OA, White B, Shaban‐Nejad A. Social determinants and indicators of COVID‐19 among marginalized communities: a scientific review and call to action for pandemic response and recovery. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022;17:e193. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tai DBG, Sia IG, Doubeni CA, Wieland ML. Disproportionate impact of COVID‐19 on racial and ethnic minority groups in the United States: a 2021 update. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022;9(6):2334‐2339. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paremoer L, Nandi S, Serag H, Baum F. Covid‐19 pandemic and the social determinants of health. BMJ. 2021;372:n129. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drake P, Rudowitz R. Tracking Social Determinants of Health During the COVID‐19 Pandemic. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2022. https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/issue-brief/tracking-social-det...
    1. Roblin DW, Khalid SI, Rouillard C. Comparison of social needs among US insured adults before and during the early phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e2146700. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types