Use of and barriers to adopting standardized social risk screening tools in federally qualified health centers during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic
- PMID: 37715519
- PMCID: PMC10796290
- DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14232
Use of and barriers to adopting standardized social risk screening tools in federally qualified health centers during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic
Abstract
Objective: To describe the national rate of social risk factor screening adoption among federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), examine organizational factors associated with social risk screening adoption, and identify barriers to utilizing a standardized screening tool in 2020.
Data source: 2020 Uniform Data System, a 100% sample of all US FQHCs (N = 1375).
Study design: We used multivariable linear probability models to assess the association between social risk screening adoption and key FQHC characteristics. We used descriptive statistics to describe variations in screening tool types and barriers to utilizing standardized tools. We thematically categorized open-ended responses about tools and barriers.
Data collection: None.
Principal findings: In 2020, 68.9% of FQHCs screened patients for any social risk factors. Characteristics associated with a greater likelihood of screening adoption included having high proportions of patients best served in a language other than English (18.8 percentage point [PP] increase, 95% CI: 6.0, 31.6) and being larger in size (10.3 PP increase, 95% CI: 0.7, 20.0). Having higher proportions of uninsured patients (14.2 PP decrease, 95% CI: -25.5, -0.3) and participating in Medicaid-managed care contracts (7.3 PP decrease, 95% CI: -14.2, -0.3) were associated with lower screening likelihood. Among screening FQHCs, the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients' Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE) was the most common tool (47.1%). Among non-screening FQHCs, common barriers to using a standardized tool included lack of staff training to discuss social issues (25.2%), inability to include screening in patient intake (21.7%), and lack of funding for addressing social needs (19.2%).
Conclusions: Though most FQHCs screened for social risk factors in 2020, various barriers have prevented nearly 1 in 3 FQHCs from adopting a screening tool. Policies that provide FQHCs with resources to support training and workflow changes may increase screening uptake and facilitate engagement with other sectors.
Keywords: cross-sector collaboration; federally qualified health centers; safety net; social determinants of health; social risk factor screening.
© 2023 The Authors. Health Services Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Health Research and Educational Trust.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no other conflicts to disclose.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Screening for Social Risk at Federally Qualified Health Centers: A National Study.Am J Prev Med. 2022 May;62(5):670-678. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.11.008. Epub 2022 Feb 8. Am J Prev Med. 2022. PMID: 35459451 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in Performance Measures and Service Volume at US Federally Qualified Health Centers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230351. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0351. JAMA Health Forum. 2023. PMID: 37027165 Free PMC article.
-
Access to Federally Qualified Health Centers and Emergency Department Use Among Uninsured and Medicaid-insured Adults: California, 2005 to 2013.Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;26(2):129-139. doi: 10.1111/acem.13494. Epub 2019 Jan 16. Acad Emerg Med. 2019. PMID: 30648780 Free PMC article.
-
Federally Qualified Health Centers as a Model to Improve Vision Health: A Systematic Review.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 1;143(3):242-251. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.6264. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 39946139
-
Federally qualified health centers: surviving Medicaid managed care, but not thriving.Health Care Financ Rev. 2000 Winter;22(2):103-17. Health Care Financ Rev. 2000. PMID: 12500323 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Examining individual- versus population-level social determinants of health in a cluster randomized trial of health coaches for patients with multiple chronic conditions.J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov 6;8(1):e191. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.598. eCollection 2024. J Clin Transl Sci. 2024. PMID: 39655003 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 Disruptions to Social Care Delivery: A Qualitative Study in Two Large, Safety-Net Primary Care Clinics.J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Oct;39(13):2515-2521. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08952-y. Epub 2024 Jul 26. J Gen Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 39060785 Free PMC article.
-
The big picture for this special issue: The state of the field, article highlights, and a look into the future.Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e14266. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14266. Epub 2023 Dec 11. Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38081479 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Medicaid Accountable Care Organization Implementation and Perinatal Claims Documentation of Social Risk Factors.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255999. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5999. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 40257795 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Drake P, Rudowitz R. Tracking Social Determinants of Health During the COVID‐19 Pandemic. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2022. https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/issue-brief/tracking-social-det...
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous