Predictive value of texture analysis on lumbar MRI in patients with chronic low back pain
- PMID: 37715790
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07936-6
Predictive value of texture analysis on lumbar MRI in patients with chronic low back pain
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine whether MRI texture analysis could predict the prognosis of patients with non-specific chronic low back pain.
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 100 patients with non-specific chronic low back pain, who underwent a conventional MRI, followed by rehabilitation treatment, and revisited after 6 months. Sociodemographic variables, numeric pain scale (NPS) value, and the degree of disability as measured by the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ), were collected. The MRI analysis included segmentation of regions of interest (vertebral endplates and intervertebral disks from L3-L4 to L5-S1, paravertebral musculature at the L4-L5 space) to extract texture variables (PyRadiomics software). The classification random forest algorithm was applied to identify individuals who would improve less than 30% in the NPS or would score more than 4 in the RMDQ at the end of the follow-up. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the ROC curve were calculated.
Results: The final series included 94 patients. The predictive model for classifying patients whose pain did not improve by 30% or more offered a sensitivity of 0.86, specificity 0.57, and area under the ROC curve 0.71. The predictive model for classifying patients with a RMDQ score 4 or more offered a sensitivity of 0.83, specificity of 0.20, and area under the ROC curve of 0.52.
Conclusion: The texture analysis of lumbar MRI could help identify patients who are more likely to improve their non-specific chronic low back pain through rehabilitation programs, allowing a personalized therapeutic plan to be established.
Keywords: Back pain; MRI; Radiomics; Texture analysis.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Vos T, Barber RM, Bell B et al (2015) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet 86(9995):743–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4 - DOI
-
- Rodriguez Reiro C (2013) Utilidad de la resonancia magnética en pacientes con dolor lumbar inespecifico. Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. Unidad de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias de la Comunidad de Madrid. Informes de evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias Tecnologías Sanitarias: 1–54. https://www.seram.es/images/site/utilidad_de_la_rnm_lumbar.pdf .
-
- Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (1998) MR imaging of the lumbar spine: prevalence of intervertebral disk extrusion and sequestration, nerve root compression, end plate abnormalities, and osteoarthritis of the facet joints in asymptomatic volunteers. Radiology 209(3):661–666. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.209.3.9844656 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tonosu J, Oka H, Higashikawa A, Okazaki H, Tanaka S, Matsudaira K (2017) The associations between magnetic resonance imaging findings and low back pain: a 10-year longitudinal analysis. Plos One 12(11):e0188057. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188057 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Rahyussalim AJ, Zufar MLL, Kurniawati T (2020) Significance of the association between disc degeneration changes on imaging and low back pain: a review article. Asian Spine J 14(2):245–57. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0046 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources