Aortic Regurgitation: Review of the Diagnostic Criteria and the Management Guidelines
- PMID: 37715804
- DOI: 10.1007/s11886-023-01955-x
Aortic Regurgitation: Review of the Diagnostic Criteria and the Management Guidelines
Abstract
Purpose of review: The evaluation of aortic regurgitation (AR) has advanced from physical examination and angiography towards evidence based non-invasive quantitative methods, primarily with echocardiography and more recently with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). This review highlights the guidelines and recent evidence in the diagnosis and management of AR; and outlines future areas of research.
Recent findings: Contemporary large cohorts of AR patients studied with echocardiography and CMR suggest that the left ventricular remodeling and systolic function triggers for intervention may be lower than previously recommended in the guidelines and emphasize the importance of LV volumes in risk stratification. Important gaps of knowledge in the quantitation of AR severity and patient risk stratification were fulfilled recently. Potential thresholds for intervention using ventricular volumes and CMR quantitative findings were recently described. The criteria for what constitutes hemodynamically significant AR and the optimal timing of intervention AR deserve further study.
Keywords: Aortic regurgitation; Aortic valve surgery; Cardiac magnetic resonance; Echocardiography; Management guidelines.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance
-
- Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. 2008 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Circulation. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190748 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- •• Vejpongsa P, Xu J, Quinones MA, Shah DJ, Zoghbi WA. Differences in cardiac remodeling in left-sided valvular regurgitation: implications for optimal definition of significant aortic regurgitation. Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15:1730–1741. This CMR study demonstrated that patients with AR tend to have larger LV size and mass compared to patients with MR at similar Rvol and RF. Patients with AR who underwent surgery due to symptoms or LV remodeling had lower thresholds of Rvol and RF.
-
- •• Malahfji M, Crudo V, Kaolawanich Y, et al. Association ofcardiac remodeling with aortic regurgitation outcomes: the AR Consortium of the SCMR Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACC.2023.03.001 . In this study of asymptomatic > moderate chronic AR patients with normal LVEF, quantitative CMR findings were associated with outcomes. LV volumes showed better prognostic value compared to LV diameters. The thresholds of Rvol and RF that demonstrated prognostic significance were also lower than thresholds recommended by guidelines.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
