Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;3(3):e043.
doi: 10.1097/cr9.0000000000000043. Epub 2023 Jun 24.

Development and Evaluation of a Data-Driven, Interactive Workshop to Facilitate Communication and Teamwork in Ambulatory Medical Oncology Settings

Amanda C Blok  1 , Deena Kelly Costa  2 , Nathan C Wright  3 , Milisa Manojlovich  4 , Christopher R Friese  5
Affiliations

Development and Evaluation of a Data-Driven, Interactive Workshop to Facilitate Communication and Teamwork in Ambulatory Medical Oncology Settings

Amanda C Blok et al. Cancer Care Res Online. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Background: While adverse events and toxicities related to cancer drug therapy in the ambulatory oncology setting are common and often rooted in communication challenges, few studies have examined the problems of communication or tested tools to improve communication in this unique, high-risk setting.

Objective: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual interdisciplinary communication Workshop designed to strengthen communication across ambulatory oncology teams members.

Methods: Surveys of patients and clinicians in one ambulatory oncology clinic were analyzed and informed the communication intervention: an interdisciplinary virtual Workshop. Workshop evaluation included an implementation survey measure and a structured debrief with Workshop attendees.

Results: 87 patients and 56 clinicians participated in pre-workshop surveys that revealed patient satisfaction with timely care and information, yet a range of rating communication experiences with the clinical team, and clinicians perceiving a high amount of organizational safety, yet rated discussion of alternatives to normal work processes low. Survey results guided reflection and discussion within the Workshop. Six clinicians participated in the interactive Workshop. Feasibility and acceptability of the virtual Workshop were supported by formative and summative data, along with suggestions for improvement.

Conclusions: The patient and clinician surveys coupled with an interactive virtual Workshop were feasible and acceptable.

Implications for practice: The Workshop identified opportunities for individual- and system-level improvements in clinical team communication. This promising strategy requires replication in larger, diverse practice samples.

Foundational: Clinicians accepted an interactive workshop that incorporated clinic-specific data and communication strategies. The program is feasible and acceptable in ambulatory oncology settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Interdisciplinary Teamwork Workshop Design and Evaluation Process
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Conceptual Framework for Interdisciplinary Communication in Cancer Care
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Taplin SH, Weaver S, Salas E, et al. Reviewing cancer care team effectiveness. Journal of Oncology Practice 2015;11(3):239–246. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baile WF, Aaron J. Patient-physician communication in oncology: past, present, and future. Current opinion in oncology 2005;17(4):331–335. - PubMed
    1. Thorne SE, Bultz BD, Baile WF. Is there a cost to poor communication in cancer care?: a critical review of the literature. Psycho‐Oncology: Journal of the Psychological, Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer 2005;14(10):875–884. - PubMed
    1. Dueck AC, Mendoza TR, Mitchell SA, et al. Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). JAMA Oncol 2015;1(8):1051–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Friese CR, Fauer AJ, Kuisell C, et al. Patient-reported outcomes collected in ambulatory oncology practices: Feasibility, patterns, and correlates. Health Serv Res 2020;55(6):966–972. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources