Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug 16;15(8):e43557.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.43557. eCollection 2023 Aug.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Paediatric Forearm Fractures of the Radius and Ulna Following Fixation by Intramedullary Nailing or Plating: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Paediatric Forearm Fractures of the Radius and Ulna Following Fixation by Intramedullary Nailing or Plating: A Systematic Review

Kingsley Mmerem et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Ipsilateral forearm fractures of both the radius and ulna in children are one of the most common forms of injuries in this population. They often result from axial loading on the hand and wrist following a fall on an outstretched hand. These injuries can often be managed either conservatively or operatively. Non-operative management involves the use of cast immobilisation after satisfactory closed reduction. Most fractures managed conservatively have been noted to have a successful outcome. Surgical options of management include the use of intramedullary nailing (IMN), plates and screws, hybrid techniques and rarely external fixators. The purpose of this systematic review is to critically analyse the functional and radiological outcomes as well as the probability of developing a complication in children that have undergone either IMN or plating of both the radius and ulna in the paediatric population. A comprehensive electronic database search from April 2014 until April 2022 was conducted. Studies from PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane electronic databases were retrieved. A total of 260 cohort studies with children between the ages of 5 to 17 years old were identified. After the application of both inclusion and exclusion criteria, six articles with a total of 409 patients relevant to this review were identified and analysed. There were no significant inconsistencies statistically in functional and radiological outcomes. Overall complication rate and time to fracture union were similar. Intramedullary nailing was noted to have a shorter operative and anaesthetic time, longer fluoroscopic exposure, and a better cosmetic outcome. Differences in bowing, radial bow magnitude and location had no overall bearing on rotation and daily activity. Considering the methodological limitations of this study, a larger sample size and higher level of evidence such as randomized control studies will yield a more conclusive result to resolve controversies. Based on currently available evidence, both plating and intramedullary nailing are excellent treatment modalities in both-bone forearm fractures.

Keywords: clinical outcomes; intramedullary nailing; ipsilateral forearm fractures; paediatric fracture; plating; radius and ulna fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart
PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

References

    1. Comparison of three surgical fixation methods for dual-bone forearm fractures in older children: a retrospective cohort study. Zheng W, Tao Z, Chen C, et al. Int J Surg. 2018;51:10–16. - PubMed
    1. Both bone forearm fractures in children and adolescents, which fixation strategy is superior - plates or nails? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Baldwin K, Morrison MJ 3rd, Tomlinson LA, Ramirez R, Flynn JM. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:0. - PubMed
    1. Flexible intramedullary nailing in the treatment of forearm fractures in children and adolescents, a systematic review. Poutoglidou F, Metaxiotis D, Kazas C, Alvanos D, Mpeletsiotis A. J Orthop. 2020;20:125–130. - PMC - PubMed
    1. A comparison of fixation methods in adolescent patients with diaphyseal forearm fractures. Freese KP, Faulk LW, Palmer C, Baschal RM, Sibbel SE. Injury. 2018;49:2053–2057. - PubMed
    1. Functional outcome following intramedullary nailing or plate and screw fixation of paediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures: a systematic review. Westacott DJ, Jordan RW, Cooke SJ. J Child Orthop. 2012;6:75–80. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources