A multicentric study to evaluate the treatment outcome and complications after oral rehabilitation with implant-supported hybrid prostheses
- PMID: 37719903
- PMCID: PMC10499642
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.06.016
A multicentric study to evaluate the treatment outcome and complications after oral rehabilitation with implant-supported hybrid prostheses
Abstract
Background: As a newer modality of rehabilitation of completely edentulous patients, there is no conclusive evidence on which of the variants of hybrid prosthesis, namely acrylic teeth on a metal substructure or porcelain fused to metal teeth over on a metal substructure, is better in terms of treatment outcome, reduced mechanical complications, and better patient compliance.
Methods: Sixteen completely edentulous patients, both male and female, were selected from the OPD of the study centers during the study period. Group A: Eight patients rehabilitated by maxillary and mandibular hybrid prosthesis using a substructure of metal covered by acrylic teeth, which was screwed on the implants. Group B: Eight patients rehabilitated by maxillary and mandibular hybrid prosthesis using a substructure of metal covered by porcelain fused to metal teeth, which was screwed on implants. The patients were recalled at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year following rehabilitation, and necessary clinical and radiological observations were made to evaluate the overall health and complications. Oral health-related quality of life was measured using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-EDENT questionnaire before treatment and after rehabilitation. The same methodology, clinical procedures, and evaluation criteria were followed in all the study centers. The data obtained were then compiled and analyzed.
Results: None of the patients in group A or B showed any signs of need to remake. There was no statistically significant difference in proportions of cases showing signs of loosening of components, soft tissue overgrowth, breakage of acrylic, chipping of porcelain, and wear of teeth in both the groups. The amount of screw loosening, wear of prosthetic superstructure, and bone loss around implants were less (even though not statistically significant) in group A. Both the groups showed satisfactory esthetics. OHIP- EDENT evaluation gave completely satisfactory report after rehabilitation in both groups.
Conclusion: Both the types of complete rehabilitation, hybrid prosthesis of acrylic teeth on a metal substructure and hybrid prosthesis of porcelain fused to metal teeth on a metal substructure were successful and comparably reliable.
Keywords: Fixed prosthesis; Hybrid prosthesis; Implant complications; Oral Health Impact Profile.
© 2021 Director General, Armed Forces Medical Services. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India Pvt. Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have none to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Metal-Ceramic and Polyether Ether Ketone-Composite Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis Supported by Four Implants and Opposed by Removable Distal Extension Partial Dentures: A Comparative Study of Clinical and Prosthetic Outcomes.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Jan-Feb;37(1):181-189. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9189. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022. PMID: 35235637
-
Five-year outcome of a retrospective cohort study on the rehabilitation of completely edentulous atrophic maxillae with immediately loaded zygomatic implants placed extra-maxillary.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Autumn;7(3):267-81. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014. PMID: 25237671
-
Implant rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with predominantly monolithic zirconia compared to metal-acrylic prostheses: a 2-year retrospective clinical study.J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2021 Jul-Aug;35(4 Suppl. 1):99-112. doi: 10.23812/21-4supp1-9. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2021. PMID: 34425665
-
Oral health-related quality of life of patients rehabilitated with fixed and removable implant-supported dental prostheses.Periodontol 2000. 2022 Feb;88(1):201-237. doi: 10.1111/prd.12419. Periodontol 2000. 2022. PMID: 35103325 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla by using quad zygomatic implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Oct;130(4):543-552. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.007. Epub 2021 Dec 14. J Prosthet Dent. 2023. PMID: 34920870 Review.
References
-
- Tarlow J.L. Fabrication of an implant surgical stent for the edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:217–218. - PubMed
-
- Londono J., Tadros M., Salgueiro M., Baker P.S. Digital design and 3D printing of an implant-supported prosthetic stent for protecting complete arch soft tissue grafts around dental implants: a dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Dec;120(6):801–804. - PubMed
-
- Suresh Sajjan M.C., Yekula P.S., Kovvuri S.S., Venkata Alluri R.R. A simple technique for fabrication of a surgical guide for predictable placement of dental implants. J Dent Implants. 2017;7:11–14.
-
- Thalji G., Bryington M., De Kok I.J., Cooper L.F. Prosthodontic management of implant therapy. Dent Clin North Am. 2014;58:207–225. - PubMed
-
- Pjetursson B.E., Thoma D., Jung R., Zwahlen M., Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(suppl 6):22–38. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials