Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 31:14:1225160.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1225160. eCollection 2023.

The impact of EMA recommendations on the real-life use of Janus kinases inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: the Expanded Risk Score in RA as a tool to quantify the risk of cardiovascular events

Affiliations

The impact of EMA recommendations on the real-life use of Janus kinases inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: the Expanded Risk Score in RA as a tool to quantify the risk of cardiovascular events

Ennio Giulio Favalli et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) the impact of EMA recommendations on the real-life prescription of JAK inhibitors (JAKis) and the use of the Expanded Risk Score in RA (ERS-RA) to quantify the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of real-life RA patients treated with JAKis. Patients were classified as ineligible for JAKis if they fulfilled EMA criteria (>65 years-old, history of malignancy, or increased risk of venous thromboembolic events [VTE] or MACE including smoking). Risk of MACE was defined according to ORAL Surveillance trial inclusion criteria (ORALSURV) or by using the ERS-RA.

Results: Of 194 patients enrolled, 57.9% were classified as ineligible according to EMA definition (ORALSURV criteria). The most frequent reason for ineligibility was increased MACE risk (70.2%), followed by age>65 (34.2%), smoking (30.7%), and increased risk of VTE (20.2%) or malignancy (7%). The use of the ERS-RA reduced the rate of patients carrying an increased CV risk to 18.6% (p<0.001 versus ORALSURV), leading to 46.4% overall ineligible patients. Over a drug-exposure of 337 patient/years, we observed 2 VTE, one MACE (non-fatal stroke), and one solid malignancy (all in the group of patients classified as ineligible according to both the definitions).

Conclusions: Rigorous application of EMA indications in clinical practice could result in the exclusion of a large proportion of RA patients from treatment with JAKis. A proper quantification of the risk for MACE by dedicated tools as ERS-RA is advocated to better tailor the management of RA.

Keywords: JAK inhibitors; b/tsDMARDs; cardiovascular risk; rheumatoid arthritis; safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author EF has been a consultant for and/or received honoraria as a speaker for the companies AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma. Author MB received honoraria as a speaker for the company Galapagos. Author RC has been a consultant for and/or received honoraria as a speaker for the companies AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Fresenius, Galapagos, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Definition of CV risk according to ORAL SURVEILLANCE trial (A) and ERS-RA (B) CV, Cardiovascular; ERS-RA, Expanded Risk Score in Rheumatoid Arthitis; HDL, High-Density Lipoprotein; CAD, Coronary Artery Disease; RA, Rheumatoid Arthritis; CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; mHAQ-DI, Modified Health assessment Questionnaire Disability Index.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Focus on factors leading to JAKis therapy ineligibility according to EMA with application of ORALSURV CV risk assessment (1A, 1B) and ERS-RA (2A, 2B). JAKis, Janus Kinase Inhibitors; EMA, European Medicines Agency; ORALSURV, ORAL Surveillance trial; CV, Cardiovascular; ERS-RA, Expanded Risk Score in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Finckh A, Gilbert B, Hodkinson B, Bae SC, Thomas R, Deane KD, et al. . Global epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol (2022) 18:591–602. doi: 10.1038/s41584-022-00827-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet (2016) 388:2023–38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aletaha D, Smolen JS. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis: A review. JAMA (2018) 320:1360–72. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13103 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tanaka Y, Luo Y, O’Shea JJ, Nakayamada S. Janus kinase-targeting therapies in rheumatology: a mechanisms-based approach. Nat Rev Rheumatol (2022) 18:133–45. doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00726-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Favalli EG. Tofacitinib’s infectious profile: concerns for clinical practice. Lancet Rheumatol (2020) 2:e65–7. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30001-1 - DOI - PubMed