Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 14;11(4):qfad041.
doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfad041. eCollection 2023 Aug.

Ethical considerations regarding penis transplantation surgery in transgender men-an empirical ethics study

Kristin B de Haseth  1   2   3 , Anne M Gehrels  1   4 , Guy Widdershoven  3   4 , Mark-Bram Bouman  1   2   3 , Tim C van de Grift  1   2   3
Affiliations
Review

Ethical considerations regarding penis transplantation surgery in transgender men-an empirical ethics study

Kristin B de Haseth et al. Sex Med. .

Abstract

Background: The ongoing quest to surgically create the (nearly) ideal neophallus in transgender men has led to the continuous development of transgender medicine and the proposed introduction of penis transplantation. However, both technical and ethical issues arise when developing this treatment.

Aim: We sought to extract ethical considerations among different stakeholder groups regarding penile transplantation surgery in transgender men and to define preliminary clinical recommendations.

Methods: Three semistructured focus groups, consisting of different stakeholders, were organized to participate in discussions of ethical considerations retrieved from the ethics literature of transplantation and transgender medicine. Analysis of the results was performed according to empirical ethics.

Outcomes: Study outcomes were the identification of qualitative themes describing ethical considerations pertaining to penile transplantation in transgender men.

Results: Nineteen people participated in this qualitative study. The main domains that emerged included arguments in favor of and arguments against penile transplantation. Although the participants expressed positive attitudes toward developing this care, with acknowledgement of the current limitations stakeholders of all groups were reluctant to endorse the introduction of penile transplantation for transgender men at this point.

Clinical implications: Under the present circumstances, all groups expressed both a wide variety of ethical considerations as well as a tendency to prefer developing alternative treatment options or improving the results of currently available treatments in relation to penile transplantation for transgender men.

Strengths and limitations: This study was the first (empirical) study to focus on this topic and included a diversity of stakeholder perspectives. Limitations included the hypothetical nature of the discussion as well as the clinical setting in which the topic has been studied.

Conclusion: Introducing penile transplantation for transgender men, under the current circumstances, comes with a wide range of ethical considerations, which deal with personal identity, autonomy, medical risks, risk for transgender support and donor willingness, and issues regarding equality. Despite the present hesitancy to use penile transplantation, should the technical side of this treatment option develop, further research in the ethical field of penile transplantation for transgender men is recommended.

Keywords: ethics study; gender dysphoria; gender reassignment surgery; penis transplantation; penis transplantation surgery; transgender men.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Publications; 2013.
    1. Coleman E, Bockting W, Botzer M, et al. . Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people, version 7. Int J Transgenderism. 2012;13(4):165–232.
    1. Wierckx K, Van Caenegem E, Elaut E, et al. . Quality of life and sexual health after sex reassignment surgery in transsexual men. J Sex Med. 2011;8(12):3379–3388. - PubMed
    1. van de Grift TC, Pigot GL, Kreukels BP, Bouman M-B, Mullender MG. Transmen’s experienced sexuality and genital gender-affirming surgery: findings from a clinical follow-up study. J Sex Marital Ther. 2019;45(3):201–205. - PubMed
    1. van de Grift TC, Pigot GL, Boudhan S, et al. . A longitudinal study of motivations before and psychosexual outcomes after genital gender-confirming surgery in transmen. J Sex Med. 2017;14(12):1621–1628. - PubMed