Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 18;199(14):1495-1500.
doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncac286.

Sex and dose rate effects in automated cytogenetics

Affiliations

Sex and dose rate effects in automated cytogenetics

Guy Garty et al. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. .

Abstract

Testing and validation of biodosimetry assays is routinely performed using conventional dose rate irradiation platforms, at a dose rate of approximately 1 Gy/min. In contrast, the exposures from an improvised nuclear device will be delivered over a large range of dose rates with a prompt irradiation component, delivered in less than 1 μs, and a protracted component delivered over hours and days. We present preliminary data from a large demographic study we have undertaken for investigation of age, sex and dose rate effects on dicentric and micronucleus yields. Our data demonstrate reduced dicentric and micronucleus yields at very high dose rates. Additionally, we have seen small differences between males and females, with males having slightly fewer micronuclei and slightly more dicentrics than females, at high doses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simulated 7–10 fallout dose profile.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fitted linear dose response for the median-corrected micronucleus index (YMN).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Micronucleus and (b) dicentric yields measured to date, using various dose rates. Data pooled across all donors Data in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of (a) micronucleus yields and (b) dicentric yields across the samples segregated by sex (shown for a dose rate of 1 Gy/s, similar trends seen for other dose rates). Males are shown on the left, females on the right.

References

    1. Homeland Security Council . National Planning Scenarios (final version 21.3). (Washington, DC: Homeland Security Council: ) (2006).
    1. Grace, M. B., Moyer, B. R., Prasher, J., Cliffer, K. D., Ramakrishnan, N., Kaminski, J., Coleman, C. N., Manning, R. G., Maidment, B. W. and Hatchett, R. Rapid radiation dose assessment for radiological public health emergencies: role of NIAID and BARDA. Health Phys. 98(2), 172–178 (2010). - PubMed
    1. Garty, G., Xu, Y., Elliston, C., Marino, S. A., Randers-Pehrson, G. and Brenner, D. J. Mice and the A-bomb: irradiation systems for realistic exposure scenarios. Radiat. Res. 187(4), 475–485 (2017). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall, E. J. and Giaccia, A. J. Radiobiology for the Radiologist, 7th edn. (Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; ) p. 546 (2012).
    1. Vozenin, M. C., Hendry, J. H. and Limoli, C. L. Biological benefits of ultra-high dose rate FLASH radiotherapy: sleeping beauty awoken. Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.) 31(7), 407–415 (2019). - PMC - PubMed