Global Prevalence of Psychological Distress and Comorbidity With Disorders of Gut-Brain Interactions
- PMID: 37721510
- DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002500
Global Prevalence of Psychological Distress and Comorbidity With Disorders of Gut-Brain Interactions
Abstract
Introduction: This study focused on defining the global prevalence of clinically relevant levels of psychological distress and somatic symptoms and the prevalence of coexistence between these symptoms and disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). We also analyzed how clinically relevant psychological distress and somatic symptoms and coexistent DGBI are associated with health-related outcomes.
Methods: We included a representative sample of 54,127 adult participants (49.1% women; mean age of 44.3 years) from 26 countries worldwide. Participants completed an Internet survey (the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study) with validated self-report questionnaires.
Results: Clinically relevant psychological distress and/or somatic symptom severity was reported by 37.5% of the sample. These participants had 4.45 times higher odds to have at least one DGBI than individuals without psychological distress and/or somatic symptoms. Compared with participants with psychological distress and/or somatic symptoms with vs without DGBI, participants with a DGBI reported increased healthcare and medication utilization (with OR from 1.6 to 2.8). Coexistent DGBI in participants with psychological distress and/or somatic symptoms was the variable most strongly associated with reduced mental (β = -0.77; confidence interval [-0.86 to -0.68]) and physical (β = -1.17; confidence interval [-1.24 to -1.10]) quality of life.
Discussion: This global study shows that psychological distress, somatic symptoms, and DGBI are very common and frequently overlap. The coexistence between psychological distress/somatic symptoms and DGBI seems to be especially detrimental to quality of life and healthcare utilization. Individuals with psychological distress/somatic symptoms and DGBI coexistence seem to be a group vulnerable to psychosocial problems that should be studied further and would likely benefit from psychological/psychiatric interventions.
Copyright © 2023 by The American College of Gastroenterology.
References
-
- Steel Z, Marnane C, Iranpour C, et al. The global prevalence of common mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013. Int J Epidemiol 2014;43(2):476–93.
-
- Vigo D, Thornicroft G, Atun R. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry 2016;3(2):171–8.
-
- Sykes MA, Blanchard EB, Lackner J, et al. Psychopathology in irritable bowel syndrome: Support for a psychophysiological model. J Behav Med 2003;26(4):361–72.
-
- Van Oudenhove L, Vandenberghe J, Vos R, et al. Factors associated with co‐morbid irritable bowel syndrome and chronic fatigue‐like symptoms in functional dyspepsia. Neurogastroenterology Motil 2011;23(6):524-e202.
-
- Sperber AD, Bangdiwala SI, Drossman DA, et al. Worldwide prevalence and burden of functional gastrointestinal disorders, results of Rome Foundation global study. Gastroenterology 2021;160(1):99–114. e3.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
