Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;52(1):197-210.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01455-x. Epub 2023 Sep 18.

Competition accumulates in successive retrieval of proper names

Affiliations

Competition accumulates in successive retrieval of proper names

Julie Bannon et al. Mem Cognit. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Proper names are especially prone to retrieval failures and tip-of-the-tongue states (TOTs)-a phenomenon wherein a person has a strong feeling of knowing a word but cannot retrieve it. Current research provides mixed evidence regarding whether related names facilitate or compete with target-name retrieval. We examined this question in two experiments using a novel paradigm where participants either read a prime name aloud (Experiment 1) or classified a written prime name as famous or non-famous (Experiment 2) prior to naming a celebrity picture. Successful retrievals decreased with increasing trial number (and was dependent on the number of previously presented similar famous people) in both experiments, revealing a form of accumulating interference between multiple famous names. However, trial number had no effect on TOTs, and within each trial famous prime names increased TOTs only in Experiment 2. These results can be explained within a framework that assumes competition for selection at the point of lexical retrieval, such that successful retrievals decrease after successive retrievals of proper names of depicted faces of semantically similar people. By contrast, the effects of written prime words only occur when prime names are sufficiently processed, and do not provide evidence for competition but may reflect improved retrieval relative to a "don't know" response.

Keywords: Language production; Priming; Proper names; Psycholinguistics; Tip-of-the-tongue.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abrams, L., & Davis, D. K. (2017). Competitors or teammates: How proper names influence each other. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416677804 - DOI
    1. Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory: Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 237–313). Academic Press.
    1. Bates, D., Maechler, B., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
    1. Brédart, S. (1993). Retrieval failures in face naming. Memory, 1(4), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658219308258243 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brédart, S. (2017). The cognitive psychology and neuroscience of naming people. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 83, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.008 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources