Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 27;15(38):44621-44630.
doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c06592. Epub 2023 Sep 18.

Lipid-Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as Probes for Screening Cell Wall Disruptors

Affiliations

Lipid-Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as Probes for Screening Cell Wall Disruptors

Nathaniel E Kallmyer et al. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. .

Abstract

Membrane-active molecules are of great importance to drug delivery and antimicrobials applications. While the ability to prototype new membrane-active molecules has improved greatly with the advent of automated chemistries and rapid biomolecule expression techniques, testing methods are still limited by throughput, cost, and modularity. Existing methods suffer from feasibility constraints of working with pathogenic living cells and by intrinsic limitations of model systems. Herein, we demonstrate an abiotic sensor that uses semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) as near-infrared fluorescent transducers to report membrane interactions. This sensor is composed of SWCNTs aqueously suspended in lipid, creating a cylindrical, bilayer corona; these SWCNT probes are very sensitive to solvent access (changes in permittivity) and thus report morphological changes to the lipid corona by modulation of fluorescent signals, where binding and disruption are reported as brightening and attenuation, respectively. This mechanism is first demonstrated with chemical and physical membrane-disruptive agents, including ethanol and sodium dodecyl sulfate, and application of electrical pulses. Known cell-penetrating and antimicrobial peptides are then used to demonstrate how the dynamic response of these sensors can be deconvoluted to evaluate different parallel mechanisms of interaction. Last, SWCNTs functionalized in several different bacterial lipopolysaccharides (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli) are used to evaluate a panel of known membrane-disrupting antimicrobials to demonstrate that drug selectivity can be assessed by suspension of SWCNTs with different membrane materials.

Keywords: cell proxy; disruption; membrane; nanosensor; screening techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) Scheme of transduction mechanism. Phospholipid functionalized SWCNT (i) are exposed to membrane-interacting molecules which can then (ii) bind to the surface of the membrane and subsequently (iii) diffuse through the membrane or (iv) self-assemble and form pores. (b) Sample sensor response (shaded region indicates one standard deviation, n = 4). Spike in signal seen during addition of disruptor occurs when the fluorimeter is uncovered and exposed to ambient light.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(a) Temporal response of PC-SWCNT to addition of ethanol. (b) Temporal response of phosphatidylcholine-SWCNT to addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate. Shaded regions in (a) and (b) indicate a single standard deviation (n = 4). (c) Temporal response of LPS (E. coli serotype O127)-SWCNT to electrical fields, applied every 60 s.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Temporal sensor responses of (a) phosphatidylcholine-SWCNT and (b) LPS-SWCNT to the TAT peptide. Shaded regions indicate a single standard deviation (n = 4). Disrupter concentrations correspond to values after addition. Responses with large error values were omitted for clarity. Final signal changes (signal at last timepoints) observed at different concentrations of TAT peptide for (c) phosphatidylcholine-SWCNT and (d) LPS-SWCNT. Error bars indicate a single standard deviation (n = 4).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Temporal sensor responses of (a) phosphatidylcholine-SWCNT and (b) LPS-SWCNT to the crotamine-derived amphipathic peptide. Disrupter concentrations correspond to values after addition. Shaded regions indicate a single standard deviation (n = 4). Responses with large error values were omitted for clarity. Final signal changes (signal at last timepoints) observed at different concentrations of amphipathic peptide for (c) phosphatidylcholine-SWCNT and (d) LPS-SWCNT. Error bars indicate a single standard deviation (n = 4).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
(a) Sample sensor response separated into different response components: (b) fast-kinetics sensor response and (c) slow-kinetics sensor response. (d) Slow-kinetics sensor response plotted against a Langmuir isotherm, R-squared(adj) = 0.8373. X-axis term corresponds to fractional coverage of available membrane binding sites (Kd = 12 μg/mL). Error bars and shaded regions indicate a single standard deviation (n = 4).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Heat maps indicating (a) total, (b) fast-kinetics, and (c) slow-kinetics sensor responses (% signal change) with respect to disruptor and disruptor concentrations for (i) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, (ii) Klebsiella pneumoniae, and (iii) Escherichia coli (O26) LPS-SWCNT.

References

    1. Mijalis AJ; Thomas DA; Simon MD; Adamo A; Beaumont R; Jensen KF; Pentelute BL A Fully Automated Flow-Based Approach for Accelerated Peptide Synthesis. Nat. Chem. Biol 2017, 13 (5), 464–466. 10.1038/nchembio.2318. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zheng H; Wang W; Li X; Wang Z; Hood L; Lausted C; Hu Z An Automated Teflon Microfluidic Peptide Synthesizer. Lab Chip 2013, 13 (17), 3347–3350. 10.1039/c3lc50632k. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dopp JL; Rothstein SM; Mansell TJ; Reuel NF Rapid Prototyping of Proteins: Mail Order Gene Fragments to Assayable Proteins within 24 Hours. Biotechnol. Bioeng 2019, 116 (3), 667–676. - PubMed
    1. Rudilla H; Merlos A; Sans-Serramitjana E; Fuste E; Sierra JM; Zalacain A; Vinuesa T; Vinas M; Sierra JM; Zalacain A; Vinuesa T; Vinas M New and Old Tools to Evaluate New Antimicrobial Peptides. AIMS Microbiol. 2018, 4 (3), 522. 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.522. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Osterman IA; Komarova ES; Shiryaev DI; Korniltsev IA; Khven IM; Lukyanov DA; Tashlitsky VN; Serebryakova MV; Efremenkova OV; Ivanenkov YA Sorting out Antibiotics’ Mechanisms of Action: A Double Fluorescent Protein Reporter for High-Throughput Screening of Ribosome and DNA Biosynthesis Inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 2016, 60 (12), 7481–7489. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources