Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2334532.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.34532.

School-Based Health Centers, Access to Care, and Income-Based Disparities

Affiliations

School-Based Health Centers, Access to Care, and Income-Based Disparities

Michel Boudreaux et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Erratum in

  • Errors in Table 1 and the Results.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2340621. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40621. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37856132 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: School-based health centers (SBHCs) are primary care clinics colocated at schools. SBHCs have the potential to improve health care access and reduce disparities, but there is limited rigorous evidence on their effectiveness at the national level.

Objective: To determine whether county-level adoption of SBHCs was associated with access, utilization, and health among children from low-income families and to measure reductions in income-based disparities.

Design, setting, and participants: This survey study used a difference-in-differences design and data from a nationally representative sample of children in the US merged with SBHC indicators from the National Census of School-Based Health Centers. The main sample included children aged 5 to 17 years with family incomes that were less than 200% of the federal poverty level observed in the National Health Interview Survey, collected between 1997 to 2018. The sample was restricted to children living in a county that adopted a center between 2003 and 2013 or that did not have a center at any time during the study period. Analyses of income-based disparities included children from higher income families (ie, 200% or higher than the federal poverty level). Data were analyzed between January 2020 and July 2023.

Exposure: County-by-year SBHC adoption.

Main outcomes and measures: Outcomes included access (usual source of care, insurance status, barriers), ambulatory care use (general physician, eye doctor, dental, mental health visits), and health (general health status, missed school days due to illness). P values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the sharpened q value method.

Results: This study included 12 624 unweighted children from low-income families and 24 631 unweighted children from higher income families. The weighted percentage of children in low-income families who resided in counties with SBHC adoption included 50.0% aged 5 to 10 years. The weighted percentages of the race and ethnicity of these children included 36.7% Hispanic children, 25.2% non-Hispanic Black children, and 30.6% non-Hispanic White children. The weighted percentages of children in the counties that never adopted SBHCs included 50.1% aged 5 to 10 years. The weighted percentages of the race and ethnicity of these children included 20.7% Hispanic children, 22.4% non-Hispanic Black children, and 52.9% non-Hispanic White children. SBHC adoption was associated with a 6.4 percentage point increase in dental visits (95% CI, 3.2-9.6 percentage points; P < .001), an 8.0 percentage point increase in having a usual source of care (95% CI, 4.5-11.5 percentage points; P < .001), and a 5.2 percentage point increase in insurance (95% CI, 1.2-9.2 percentage points; P = .03). No other statistically significant associations were found with other outcomes. SBHCs were associated with relative reductions in income-based disparities to dental visits by 76% (4.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.0-7.7 percentage points), to insured status by 63% (3.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.3-5.7 percentage points), and to having a usual source of care by 98% (7.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 5.4-9.1 percentage points).

Conclusions and relevance: In this survey study with difference-in-differences analysis of SBHC adoption, SBHCs were associated with access to care and reduced income-based disparities. These findings support additional SBHC expansion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Percentage of School Age Children in Low-Income Families With Access to a School-Based Health Center (SBHC), 1997-2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS)
Data are from the 1997 to 2018 NHIS merged with SBHC adoption indicators from the Census of School-Based Health Centers., The analytic sample includes children from low-income families residing in counties consistently observed in every NHIS year that either obtained a center between 2003 and 2013 or never obtained a center.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Difference-in-Differences Estimates by Subgroup, Children From Low-Income Families
Data are from the 1997 to 2018 National Health Interview Survey merged with SBHC adoption indicators from the Census of School-Based Health Centers., Estimates are from stratified 2-stage difference-in-difference regressions. Error bars denote 95% CIs.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. The Association of School-Based Health Centers (SBHCs) With Income-Based Disparities
Data are from the 1997 to 2018 National Health Interview Survey merged with SBHC adoption indicators from the Census of School-Based Health Centers., Estimates are derived from ordinary least-squares difference-in-difference regressions with income group interaction terms that allow us to recover the disparity with and without SBHCs. We show in the eAppendix in Supplement 1 that the interaction coefficients are similar in the 2-stage and ordinary least-squares models. USOC indicates usual source of care. aThe reduction in disparity is statistically significant at P ≤ .05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Love HE, Schlitt J, Soleimanpour S, Panchal N, Behr C. Twenty years of school-based health care growth and expansion. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38(5):755-764. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05472 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Love H, Soleimanpour S, Panchal N, Schlitt J, Behr C, Even M. 2016-2017 National School-Based Health Care Census report. School-Based Health Alliance. Accessed August 23, 2023. https://www.sbh4all.org
    1. Keeton V, Soleimanpour S, Brindis CD. School-based health centers in an era of health care reform: building on history. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2012;42(6):132-156. doi:10.1016/j.cppeds.2012.03.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clayton S, Chin T, Blackburn S, Echeverria C. Different setting, different care: integrating prevention and clinical care in school-based health centers. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(9):1592-1596. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.186668 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knopf JA, Finnie RK, Peng Y, et al. ; Community Preventive Services Task Force . School-based health centers to advance health equity: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(1):114-126. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.01.009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms