Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 1;30(7):e202302996.
doi: 10.1002/chem.202302996. Epub 2023 Dec 11.

Enzymatic Resolution and Decarboxylative Functionalization of α-Sulfinyl Esters

Affiliations

Enzymatic Resolution and Decarboxylative Functionalization of α-Sulfinyl Esters

Suraksha Gahalawat et al. Chemistry. .

Abstract

α-Sulfinyl esters can be readily prepared through thiol substitution of α-bromo esters followed by oxidation to the sulfoxide. Enzymatic resolution with lipoprotein lipase provides both the unreacted esters and corresponding α-sulfinyl carboxylic acids in high yields and enantiomeric ratios. Subsequent decarboxylative halogenation, dihalogenation, trihalogenation and cross-coupling gives rise to functionalized sulfoxides. The method has been applied to the asymmetric synthesis of a potent inhibitor of 15-prostaglandin dehydrogenase.

Keywords: decarboxylation; halogenation; lipase; resolution; sulfoxides.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Representative sulfoxide containing natural products and pharmaceutical agents.
Scheme 1.
Scheme 1.
Ester/acid interconversion allows access to both sulfoxide enantiomers.
Scheme 2.
Scheme 2.
Decarboxylative halogenation of α-sulfinyl carboxylic acids.
Scheme 3.
Scheme 3.
Synthesis of dihalosulfoxides. [a] Isolated yield over 2 steps.
Scheme 4.
Scheme 4.
Tribromination of α-sulfinyl acids.
Scheme 5.
Scheme 5.
Asymmetric synthesis of sulfoxide inhibitors of 15-prostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH).

Similar articles

References

    1. Wang N, Saidhareddy P, Jiang X, Nat. Prod. Rep 2020, 37, 246–275; - PubMed
    2. Hai Y, Wei M-Y, Wang C-Y, Gu Y-C, Shao C-L, Mar. Life Sci. Technol 2021, 3, 488–518. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carreno MC, Chem. Rev 1995, 95, 1717–1760;
    2. Casoni G, Kucukdisli M, Fordham JM, Burns M, Myers EL, Aggarwal VK, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 11877–11886; - PubMed
    3. Aiken SG, Bateman JM, Liao H-H, Fawcett A, Bootwicha T, Vincetti P, Myers EL, Noble A, Aggarwal VK, Nat. Chem 2023, 15, 248–256. - PubMed
    1. Satoh T, Oohara T, Ueda Y, Yamakawa K, J. Org. Chem 1989, 54, 3130–3136;
    2. Lanfranchi DA, Hanquet G, J. Org. Chem 2006, 71, 4854–4861; - PubMed
    3. Carmen Carreño M, Hernández-Torres G, Ribagorda M, Urbano A, Chemical Commun. 2009, 6129–6144; - PubMed
    4. Antczak MI, Cai F, Ready JM, Org. Lett 2011, 13, 184–187; - PMC - PubMed
    5. Batisse C, Panossian A, Hanquet G, Leroux FR, Chemical Commun. 2018, 54, 10423–10426; - PubMed
    6. Salom-Roig X, Bauder C, Synthesis 2020, 52, 964–978.
    1. Trost BM, Rao M, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54, 5026–5043; - PubMed
    2. Angew. Chem 2015, 127, 5112–5130;
    3. Otocka S, Kwiatkowska M, Madalińska L, Kiełbasiński P, Chem. Rev 2017, 117, 4147–4181; - PubMed
    4. Jia T, Wang M, Liao J, in Sulfur Chemistry (Ed.: Jiang X), Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019, pp. 399–427.
    1. Block SS, Stephens RL, Barreto A, Murrill WA, Science 1955, 121, 505–506. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources