Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan;10(1):65-75.
doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2023.08.012. Epub 2023 Sep 17.

Chemical-genetics refines transcription factor regulatory circuits

Affiliations
Review

Chemical-genetics refines transcription factor regulatory circuits

Hillary M Layden et al. Trends Cancer. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Transcriptional dysregulation is a key step in oncogenesis, but our understanding of transcriptional control has relied on genetic approaches that are slow and allow for compensation. Chemical-genetic approaches have shortened the time frame for the analysis of transcription factors from days or weeks to minutes. These studies show that while DNA-binding proteins bind to thousands of sites, they are directly required to regulate only a small cadre of genes. Moreover, these transcriptional control networks are far more distinct, with much less overlap and interconnectivity than predicted from DNA binding. The identified direct targets can then be used to dissect the mechanism of action of these factors, which could identify ways to therapeutically manipulate these oncogenic transcriptional control networks.

Keywords: PROTACs; cancer; chemical-genetics; degron tags; molecular glue; therapeutics; transcription.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Key figure. Chemical-genetics enable the temporal analysis of transcription. Traditional methods of genetic perturbation (knockout or RNAi knockdown) require days to weeks to establish stable models of transcriptional dysregulation. Genomic analysis of these models does not allow the separation of the primary response to the disruption of a transcriptional regulator from the secondary and tertiary responses that occur after the fact. Chemical-genetic perturbation of transcriptional regulators can disrupt protein function in just minutes. The combination of chemical genetics with nascent RNA analysis can help delineate the primary and secondary responses to perturbation of transcriptional regulators. (Adapted with permission from Swift and Corruzzi [86]).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Flavahan WA et al. (2017) Epigenetic plasticity and the hallmarks of cancer. Science 357, eaal2380. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhu J et al. (1997) Arsenic-induced PML targeting onto nuclear bodies: Implications for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94, 3978–3983 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krönke J et al. (2014) Lenalidomide Causes Selective Degradation of IKZF1 and IKZF3 in Multiple Myeloma Cells. Science 343, 301–305 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao Y et al. (2022) “Stripe” transcription factors provide accessibility to co-binding partners in mammalian genomes. Mol. Cell DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.06.029 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nie Z et al. (2012) c-Myc Is a Universal Amplifier of Expressed Genes in Lymphocytes and Embryonic Stem Cells. Cell 151, 68–79 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources