Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Sep 18;25(1):172.
doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03128-1.

Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with ankylosing spondylitis refractory to biologic therapy: 1-year results from the open-label extension of a phase III study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with ankylosing spondylitis refractory to biologic therapy: 1-year results from the open-label extension of a phase III study

Xenofon Baraliakos et al. Arthritis Res Ther. .

Abstract

Background: Upadacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the phase III SELECT-AXIS programs. We report the 1-year efficacy and safety in patients with AS and an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR) from the SELECT-AXIS 2 study.

Methods: Patients ≥ 18 years with active AS who met the modified New York criteria for AS and were bDMARD-IR received double-blind upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) or placebo for 14 weeks. Patients who completed 14 weeks could enter an open-label extension and receive upadacitinib 15 mg QD for up to 2 years. Efficacy endpoints included the percentage of patients achieving ≥ 40% improvement in Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society response (ASAS40), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) low disease activity (LDA), and ASDAS inactive disease (ID); and change from baseline in total and nocturnal back pain, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). Subgroup analyses (bDMARD lack of efficacy versus intolerance, and prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor [TNFi] versus interleukin-17 inhibitor [IL-17i] exposure) were conducted. Binary and continuous efficacy endpoints were assessed using non-responder imputation with multiple imputation (NRI-MI) and as observed (AO) analyses; and mixed-effects model repeated measures (MMRM) and AO, respectively. Safety was assessed based on adverse events. Data through week 52 are reported.

Results: Of 420 randomized patients, 366 (continuous upadacitinib: n = 181; placebo to upadacitinib: n = 185) completed 52 weeks of treatment. At week 52, in the continuous upadacitinib and placebo to upadacitinib groups, ASAS40, ASDAS LDA, and ASDAS ID were achieved by 66% and 65%, 57% and 55%, and 26% and 25% (all NRI-MI); and change from baseline in total back pain, nocturnal back pain, and BASFI was -4.5 and -4.3, -4.6 and -4.4, and -3.6 and -3.5 (all MMRM), respectively. No new safety risks were identified. Subgroup analyses were consistent with the overall study population.

Conclusions: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD demonstrated sustained improvement up to 52 weeks in bDMARD-IR patients with AS. Efficacy was generally similar in patients with lack of efficacy versus intolerance to bDMARDs and prior TNFi versus IL-17i exposure.

Trial registration: NCT02049138.

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis; Biologic; Inadequate response; Janus kinase inhibitor; Open-label extension; Refractory; Tumor necrosis factor; Upadacitinib.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

XB has received grant/research support from AbbVie and Novartis; consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; speakers’ bureau fees from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; and is an editorial board member of the Annals of Rheumatic Diseases. DvdH has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Bayer, BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma; and is the director of Imaging Rheumatology BV. JS has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Merck, and UCB; has been a consultant for AbbVie, Merck, Novartis, and UCB; and has served on the speakers’ bureau for AbbVie, Merck, and Novartis. RDI has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, and Novartis; and has been a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sandoz. HK has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eisai, and Mitsubishi-Tanabe; consulting fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, and UCB; and received speakers’ bureau fees from AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, BMS, Chugai, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, and Pfizer. YL, XB, AS, and PW are full-time, salaried employees of AbbVie Inc. and own AbbVie stock or stock options. I-HS is a full-time, salaried employee of AbbVie, owns AbbVie stock or stock options, and is an inventor on a patent application. AD has received grant/research support from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; and honoraria or consultation fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Aurinia, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient disposition through week 52. aPatients were screened between November 26, 2019 and May 20, 2021 for the SELECT-AXIS 2 master protocol, which used a common screening platform to assign patients to either the AS bDMARD-IR study or the nr-axSpA study. bPatients could have multiple criteria or multiple reasons for screening failure. cOther reasons included imaging, site, or system issues. dPatients did not fail screening. ePrimary reason for discontinuation provided. AS ankylosing spondylitis, bDMARD biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, IR inadequate response, nr-axSpA non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ASAS40 (a), ASDAS LDA (b), and ASDAS ID (c) responses over time. Patients initially randomized to receive placebo received open-label upadacitinib beginning at week 14. NRI-MI (NRI incorporating MI to handle missing data due to COVID-19) and AO analyses were used. AO as observed, ASAS40 ≥ 40% improvement in Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society response, ASDAS Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, CI confidence interval, ID inactive disease, LDA low disease activity, MI multiple imputation, NRI non-responder imputation, QD once daily, W week
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean change in total back pain (a), nocturnal back pain (b), and BASFI (c) over time. Patients initially randomized to receive placebo received open-label upadacitinib beginning at week 14. MMRM and AO analyses were used. Δ change, AO as observed, BASFI Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, CI confidence interval, MMRM mixed-effects model repeated measures, QD once daily, SD standard deviation, W week

References

    1. de Winter JJ, van Mens LJ, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Baeten DL. Prevalence of peripheral and extra-articular disease in ankylosing spondylitis versus non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a meta-analysis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1093-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Navarro-Compán V, Sepriano A, El-Zorkany B, van der Heijde D. Axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(12):1511–1521. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strand V, Singh JA. Patient burden of axial spondyloarthritis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2017;23(7):383–391. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000589. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sieper J, Poddubnyy D. Axial spondyloarthritis. Lancet. 2017;390(10089):73–84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31591-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ramiro S, Nikiphorou E, Sepriano A, Ortolan A, Webers C, Baraliakos X, et al. ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(1):19–34. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223296. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data