Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 19:6:e47691.
doi: 10.2196/47691.

Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression Among Homebound Older Adults: Development and Usability Study

Xiaoling Xiang  1 , Jay Kayser  1 , Samson Ash  1 , Chuxuan Zheng  2 , Yihang Sun  3 , Addie Weaver  1 , Ruth Dunkle  1 , James A Blackburn  1 , Alex Halavanau  4 , Jia Xue  5   6 , Joseph A Himle  1
Affiliations

Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression Among Homebound Older Adults: Development and Usability Study

Xiaoling Xiang et al. JMIR Aging. .

Abstract

Background: Homebound older adults are a high-risk group for depression. However, many of them face barriers to accessing evidence-supported mental health treatments. Digital mental health interventions can potentially improve treatment access, but few web-based interventions are explicitly tailored for depression in older adults.

Objective: This paper describes the development process of Empower@Home, a web-delivered intervention for depression in homebound older adults that is based on cognitive behavioral therapy, and reports on the outcomes of usability studies.

Methods: Empower@Home was developed in collaboration with community agencies, stakeholders, and older adults, guided by user-centered design principles. User needs were assessed through secondary data analysis, demographic and health profiles from administrative data, and interviews and surveys of community partners. A comparative usability evaluation was conducted with 10 older adults to assess the usability of Empower@Home compared to 2 similar programs. Field testing was conducted with 4 end users to detect additional usability issues.

Results: Feedback and recommendations from community partners heavily influenced the content and design of Empower@Home. The intervention consists of 9 sessions, including psychoeducation and an introduction to cognitive behavioral therapy skills and tools through short video clips, in-session exercises, an animated storyline, and weekly out-of-session home practice. A printed workbook accompanies the web-based lessons. In comparative usability testing (N=10), Empower@Home received a System Usability Scale score of 78 (SD 7.4), which was significantly higher than the 2 comparator programs (t9=3.28; P=.005 and t9=2.78; P=.011). Most participants, 80% (n=8), preferred Empower@Home over the comparators. In the longitudinal field test (n=4), all participants reported liking the program procedures and feeling confident in performing program-related tasks. The single-subject line graph showed an overall downward trend in their depression scores over time, offering an encouraging indication of the intervention's potential effects.

Conclusions: Collaboration with community stakeholders and careful consideration of potential implementation issues during the design process can result in more usable, engaging, and effective digital mental health interventions.

Keywords: CBT; aging; cognitive behavioral therapy; community; community-engaged research; depression; design; development; digital health; digital mental health; geriatric; geriatric depression; geriatrics; internet; internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy; mental health; old age; older adult; older adults; psychotherapy; usability; user centered design; web-based; web-based health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Single-subject line graph showing Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores from in-app assessments.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Xiang X, Leggett A, Himle JA, Kales HC. Major depression and subthreshold depression among older adults receiving home care. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;26(9):939–949. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.05.001. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29884541 S1064-7481(18)30326-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruce ML, McAvay GJ, Raue PJ, Brown EL, Meyers BS, Keohane DJ, Jagoda DR, Weber C. Major depression in elderly home health care patients. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(8):1367–1374. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.8.1367. https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.8.1367 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woody CA, Ferrari AJ, Siskind DJ, Whiteford HA, Harris MG. A systematic review and meta-regression of the prevalence and incidence of perinatal depression. J Affect Disord. 2017;219:86–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.003. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165032717307231?... S0165-0327(17)30723-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schulz R, Beach SR, Ives DG, Martire LM, Ariyo AA, Kop WJ. Association between depression and mortality in older adults: the cardiovascular health study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1761–1768. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.12.1761. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/485372 ioi90600 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brenes GA, Danhauer SC, Lyles MF, Hogan PE, Miller ME. Barriers to mental health treatment in rural older adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015;23(11):1172–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2015.06.002. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26245880 S1064-7481(15)00187-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources