Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 28;2(2):e25204.
doi: 10.2196/25204.

Use of Spinal Anesthesia in Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomies: Case Series

Affiliations

Use of Spinal Anesthesia in Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomies: Case Series

Md Jafrul Hannan et al. JMIRx Med. .

Abstract

Background: Owing to the widespread use of general anesthesia, administration of spinal anesthesia in pediatric patients is not widely practiced. Yet there is ample positive evidence demonstrating its safety, effectiveness, and success.

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare postoperative patient comfort, length of hospital stay, and cost-effectiveness of pediatric laparoscopic appendectomies performed under spinal and general anesthesia with the usual standard-of-care procedures employed in the hospital.

Methods: This is a case series of 77 consecutive pediatric laparoscopic appendectomies (involving 5-8-year-old children) that took place in a hospital in Chittagong, Bangladesh, in 2019. A total of 40 patients underwent spinal anesthesia and 37 patients underwent general anesthesia. Variables such as surgery and operation theater times, pain score, incidence of postsurgery vomiting, analgesic usage, discharge times, and hospital costs were recorded. Statistical analysis was used to analyze the data as a function of anesthesia type.

Results: The probability of vomiting when using spinal compared to general anesthesia was lower within the first 5 hours (P<.001) and 6 hours (P=.008) postoperation. A significant difference (P<.001) was observed between the total costs of the two procedures, with spinal anesthesia being less expensive. Patients were more likely to be discharged the same day of the procedure when spinal anesthesia was used (P=.008).

Conclusions: Spinal anesthesia has many advantages compared to general anesthesia for pediatric laparoscopic appendectomies. Patient comfort is improved due to a significant decrease in vomiting. This allows for more rapid hospital discharges and substantial cost savings, without compromising the outcome of the procedure.

Keywords: anesthesia; appendectomy; appendix; general anesthesia; keyhole; laparoscopy; pediatrics; spinal anesthesia; surgery; vomiting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of the cost of laparoscopic appendectomies between procedures with general and spinal anesthesia (in Bangladesh taka; 1 USD=84.75 BDT).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Multiple correspondence analysis plot from variables listed.

Update of

  • JMIRx Med. 2:e25204.

Similar articles

References

    1. Brown T. History of pediatric regional anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Jan;22(1):3–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03636.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berkowitz S, Greene B. Spinalanesthesia in children. Anesthesiology. 1951 May 01;12(3):376–387. doi: 10.1097/00000542-195105000-00013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Becke K. Complications in pediatric anesthesia (Komplikationen in der Kinderanästhesie) Anaesthesist. 2014 Jul 10;63(7):548–54. doi: 10.1007/s00101-014-2357-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abajian JC, Paul Mellish RW, Browne AF, Perkins FM, Lambert DH, Mazuzan JE. Spinal Anesthesia for Surgery in the High-Risk Infant. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1984;63(3):359–362. doi: 10.1213/00000539-198403000-00015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams RK, Adams DC, Aladjem EV, Kreutz JM, Sartorelli KH, Vane DW, Abajian JC. The Safety and Efficacy of Spinal Anesthesia for Surgery in Infants: The Vermont Infant Spinal Registry. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2006;102(1):67–71. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000159162.86033.21. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources