Editorial
doi: 10.1007/BF02596198.
Evaluating diagnostic tests: what is done--what needs to be done
- PMID: 3772600
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02596198
Item in Clipboard
Editorial
Evaluating diagnostic tests: what is done--what needs to be done
J Gen Intern Med.
1986 Jul-Aug.
No abstract available
Similar articles
-
Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards.Am J Clin Pathol. 1990 Feb;93(2):252-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/93.2.252. Am J Clin Pathol. 1990. PMID: 2405632 Review.
-
Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random.Stat Med. 2011 Jan 30;30(2):200. doi: 10.1002/sim.4115. Stat Med. 2011. PMID: 21204125 No abstract available.
-
Regarding the paper 'Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random'.Stat Med. 2010 Oct 30;29(24):2568. doi: 10.1002/sim.4032. Stat Med. 2010. PMID: 20954220 No abstract available.
-
Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1996 May;14(2):101-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1016317. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1996. PMID: 8796932 Review.
-
An evidence-based approach to test accuracy studies in gynecologic oncology: the 'STARD' checklist.Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Mar;96(3):575-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.09.053. Gynecol Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15721396 No abstract available.