Comparison of the Characteristics of Brucella Patients Diagnosed With Blood Culture Positivity and/or Serology
- PMID: 37727170
- PMCID: PMC10506729
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43758
Comparison of the Characteristics of Brucella Patients Diagnosed With Blood Culture Positivity and/or Serology
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate and compare the clinical, laboratory, and treatment response characteristics of patients diagnosed with positive culture or serology. In this way, we wanted to assess the validity of serological diagnosis.
Materials and methods: The study was designed as a retrospective cross-sectional study between January 2010 and 2020. Patients with clinical and laboratory findings of acute/subacute brucellosis, patients with positive serological tests, and patients with growth of Brucella spp. in blood culture were included in the study. The patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 - Wright agglutination test result ≥ 1/160 and Brucella spp. growth in blood culture; Group 2 - Wright agglutination test result ≥ 1/160 and no growth in blood culture; and Group 3 - Brucella spp. growth in blood culture and negative serological test. These three groups were retrospectively evaluated for clinical features, laboratory parameters, areas of involvement, treatment options, and treatment response.
Results: We identified 294 patients diagnosed with brucellosis. Blood cultures were obtained from all patients, and Brucella spp. was detected in 40 patients (13.6%). There were 35 patients in Group 1, 254 patients in Group 2, and five patients in Group 3. When examining patients with symptoms, only fever showed a difference between the groups, which was significantly higher in Group 1. Laboratory investigations of the C-reactive protein (CRP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels of the patients showed significant differences between the groups; these parameters were significantly higher in Group 1.
Conclusion: No significant difference was found in terms of treatment response and prognosis between patients with and without blood culture growth who were clinically compatible with acute/subacute brucellosis as diagnosed by serological methods. Therefore, serological tests are reliable methods for the diagnosis of brucellosis in cases where blood culture is inconclusive.
Keywords: blood culture; brucellosis; infection; rose bengal dye; serology.
Copyright © 2023, Konya et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Evaluating the efficiency of TaqMan real-time PCR and serological methods in the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical specimens collected from suspected patients in Ardabil, Iran.J Microbiol Methods. 2020 Aug;175:105982. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105982. Epub 2020 Jun 13. J Microbiol Methods. 2020. PMID: 32544484
-
Bacteremic and Nonbacteremic Brucellosis in Children in Turkey.J Trop Pediatr. 2022 Jan 7;68(1):fmab114. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmab114. J Trop Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 35022774
-
Lack of correlation of Brucella antibody titers with clinical outcomes and culture positivity of brucellosis.Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines. 2021 Feb 2;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40794-021-00130-w. Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines. 2021. PMID: 33531081 Free PMC article.
-
[The value of culture and serological methods in the diagnosis of human brucellosis].Mikrobiyol Bul. 2008 Jan;42(1):185-95. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2008. PMID: 18444578 Review. Turkish.
-
The use of skin delayed-type hypersensitivity as an adjunct test to diagnose brucellosis in cattle: a review.Vet Q. 2000 Jul;22(3):123-30. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2000.9695040. Vet Q. 2000. PMID: 10952440 Review.
Cited by
-
Determining Diagnostic Sensitivity: A Comparison of Rose Bengal Test, Coombs Gel Test, ELISA and Bacterial Culture in Brucellosis Diagnosis-Analyzing Clinical Effectiveness in Light of Inflammatory Markers.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 17;14(14):1546. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141546. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39061683 Free PMC article.
-
Research hotspots and development trends of Brucellar spondylitis in the past 30 years: a bibliometric analysis.Front Microbiol. 2025 Feb 19;16:1541792. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1541792. eCollection 2025. Front Microbiol. 2025. PMID: 40046306 Free PMC article.
-
Establishment of a 23S rRNA assay for Brucella and its application in evaluating bacterial growth status.Vet Res Commun. 2025 Feb 21;49(2):110. doi: 10.1007/s11259-025-10676-1. Vet Res Commun. 2025. PMID: 39982617
References
-
- A new perspective to the brucellosis from east of turkey; does the infections really decrease over the years? Bozlak ÇEB, Celebi Ö. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1494338 New Trend Med Sci. 2021;2:69–74.
-
- Düşük endemisite beklenen bir bölgede bruselloz seroprevalansı. Öner SZ, Türkoğlu E. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mjwbs/issue/54065/677090 Med J West Black Sea. 2020;4:18–23.
-
- The Turkish clinical microbiology and infectious diseases society (KLIMIK) evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of brucellosis, 2023. Şimşek-Yavuz S, Özger S, Benli A, et al. Klimik Derg. 2023;36:86–123.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous