Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2023 Aug 25:17:1271818.
doi: 10.3389/fnint.2023.1271818. eCollection 2023.

Editorial: Reproducibility in neuroscience

Affiliations
Editorial

Editorial: Reproducibility in neuroscience

Nafisa M Jadavji et al. Front Integr Neurosci. .
No abstract available

Keywords: FAIR (findable accessible interoperable and reusable) principles; replicability; replication studies; research integrity; rigor and quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Key elements of reproducible (neuro)science. Graphical illustration showing which are the critical ingredients that make a paper or research project reproducible and replicable (Auer et al., 2021). Library versioning refers to the practice of assigning unique identifiers (usually numbers or names) to different releases or versions of a software library. Containerization is a technology that allows developers to package an application and all its dependencies (such as libraries and configurations) together into a single unit called a “container.” More information can be found at: www.repro4everyone.org.

Comment on

  • Editorial on the Research Topic Reproducibility in neuroscience

References

    1. Auer S., Haelterman N. A., Weissberger T. L., Erlich J. C., Susilaradeya D., Julkowska M., et al. . (2021). Reproducibility for everyone team. A community-led initiative for training in reproducible research. Elife. 10, e64719. 10.7554/eLife.64719 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Botvinik-Nezer R., Wager T. D. (2022). Reproducibility in neuroimaging analysis: challenges and solutions. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging. 19, S2451. 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.12.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cone I., Shouval H. Z. (2021). Learning precise spatiotemporal sequences via biophysically realistic learning rules in a modular, spiking network. Elife. 10, e63751. 10.7554/eLife.63751 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Errington T. M., Denis A., Perfito N., Iorns E., Nosek B. A. (2021). Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology. Elife. 10, e67995. 10.7554/eLife.67995 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haeusler S., Maass W. A. (2007). statistical analysis of information-processing properties of lamina-specific cortical microcircuit models. Cereb. Cortex. 17, 149–162. 10.1093/cercor/bhj132 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources