Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 18;9(1):E18-E25.
doi: 10.1055/a-2137-8318. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: Single Dose of Intrasac Ultrasound-Guided Methotrexate Injection Seems to be a Safe Option for Treatment

Angeliki Rouvalis  1 , Panagiotis Vlastarakos  1 , Georgios Daskalakis  1 , Abraham Pouliakis  2 , Sofoklis Stavrou  3 , Maria Tsiriva  3 , Maria Giourga  3 , Angeliki Gerede  4 , Kalliopi Pappa  3 , Themos Gregoriadis  3 , Dimitrios-Efthymios Vlachos  3 , Alexandros Rodolakis  3 , Ekaterini Domali  3
Affiliations

Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: Single Dose of Intrasac Ultrasound-Guided Methotrexate Injection Seems to be a Safe Option for Treatment

Angeliki Rouvalis et al. Ultrasound Int Open. .

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of local ultrasound-guided methotrexate injection in patients with caesarean section scar pregnancy, to chart the course of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels (HCG) after treatment, and to see if HCG levels are correlated with clinical presentation.

Methods: Between May 2018 and January 2021, data were collected retrospectively from the Early Pregnancy Unit of a tertiary hospital.

Results: Our clinic assessed 20 patients; one disputed terminating the pregnancy and was not included in the research. The remaining 19 patients, with a median age of 34 years, received intragestational sac methotrexate injection under ultrasound guidance. 7w3d was the median gestational age. These women had one to four previous caesarean sections, with a mean of 1.60±9. Patients with caesarean scar pregnancy most typically presented with spotting (42.1%), whereas 26.3% were asymptomatic. Except in cases of pain, the symptomatic women's HCG levels were lower than in the non-symptomatic women. The level of HCG in patients with pain was approximately double that of non-pain patients (p=0.2557). In our series, intragestational sac methotrexate injection was effective in 17/19 women, or 89.5% (95%CI: 75.7-100%). HCG levels were undetectable in 97.6±30 days on average (minimum: 42 days, maximum: 147 days).

Conclusion: Caesarean scar pregnancy is a rare possibly fatal condition with no consensus on the optimal treatment. An experienced Early Pregnancy Unit member performing local methotrexate injections under ultrasound guidance is a feasible and successful strategy in clinically stable patients.

Keywords: cesarean scar pregnancy; ectopic pregnancy; gynecology; methotrexate; transvaginal ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cesarean scar pregnancy. The red arrow indicates the empty endometrial cavity; the green arrow shows the closed cervical canal; the blue arrow signifies the gestational sac implanted in the Cesarean scar.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Timor-Tritch et al., approach for the diagnosis of a Cesarean scar pregnancy. The red line connects the external cervical os to the uterine fundus. The green line separates the red one into two equal parts. The position of the gestational sac in the cross-sectional area indicates the risk of CSP.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Methotrexate injection in the gestational sac.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Evolution of HCG for the study population and detail of the HCG levels near zero.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Box and whisker plots of HCG levels during MTX injection and the various symptoms. Box limits show the Q1 and Q3 values, the line within the boxes indicates the median values, the diamond symbol corresponds to the mean values, and the whisker limits to the minimum and maximum values.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
( a–c ): Patient 2. ( a ) CSP at 7w4d of gestation; ( b ) Evidence of peritrophoblastic vascularity on color Doppler; ( c ) Ultrasonographic appearance of the uterus four months after procedure.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Larsen J V, Solomon M H. Pregnancy in a uterine scar sacculus – an unusual cause of postabortal haemorrhage. A case report. S Afr Med J. 1978;53:142–143. - PubMed
    1. WHO H. WHO statement on caesarean section rates 2015 [Available from:https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_h... - PubMed
    1. Harb H M, Knight M, Bottomley C, Overton C, Tobias A, Gallos I D et al.Caesarean scar pregnancy in the UK: a national cohort study. Bjog. 2018;125:1663–70. - PubMed
    1. Osborn D A, Williams T R, Craig B M. Cesarean scar pregnancy: sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings, complications, and treatment. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:1449–1456. - PubMed
    1. Jurkovic D, Jauniaux E, Kurjak A, Hustin J, Campbell S, Nicolaides K H. Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of the uteroplacental circulation in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:365–369. - PubMed