Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Jan 1;42(1):136-142.
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003570. Epub 2023 Sep 19.

A real-world analysis of outcomes and healthcare costs of patients on perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine single-pill vs. multiple-pill combination in Italy

Jacques R Snyman  1 , Luiz Aparecido Bortolotto  2 , Luca Degli Esposti  3 , Pathiyil Balagopalan Jayagopal  4 , Alexandra O Konradi  5 , Valentina Perrone  3 , Claudio Borghi  6
Affiliations
Observational Study

A real-world analysis of outcomes and healthcare costs of patients on perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine single-pill vs. multiple-pill combination in Italy

Jacques R Snyman et al. J Hypertens. .

Abstract

Objectives: This analysis compared adherence, cardiovascular (CV) events and all-cause mortality incidence, and healthcare costs among hypertensive patients treated with perindopril (PER)/indapamide (IND)/amlodipine (AML) in single-pill combination (SPC) vs. multiple-pill combination, in a real-world setting in Italy.

Methods: In this observational retrospective analysis of Italian administrative databases, adult patients treated with PER/IND/AML between 2010 and 2020 were divided into two cohorts: single-pill vs. multiple-pill. Patient data were available for at least one year before and after index date. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce selection bias. Adherence was defined as proportion of days covered: non-adherence, <40%; partial adherence, 40-79%, and adherence ≥80%. Mortality incidence and CV events as single, or composite, endpoints were evaluated after first year of follow-up. Healthcare cost analyses were performed from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service.

Results: Following PSM, the single-pill cohort included 12 150 patients, and the multiple-pill cohort, 6105. The SPC cohort had a significantly higher percentage of adherent patients vs. the multiple-pill cohort (59.9% vs. 26.9%, P < 0.001). Following the first year of follow-up, incidence of all-cause mortality, and combined endpoint of all-cause mortality and CV events were lower in the SPC cohort compared with multiple-pill cohort. Average annual direct healthcare costs were lower in the single-pill cohort (€2970) vs. multiple-pill cohort (€3642); cost of all drugs and all-cause hospitalizations were major contributors.

Conclusion: The SPC of PER/IND/AML, compared with multiple-pill combination, is associated with higher adherence to medication, lower incidence of CV events and mortality, and reduced healthcare costs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.R.S. declares support for the present manuscript from Servier; grants or contracts from Servier; consulting fees from Servier; payment or honoraria from Servier; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Servier. L.A.B. declares consulting fees from Servier; consulting fees from Medtronics to their institution; and payment or honoraria from Servier and Merck. P.B.J. declares support for the present manuscript from Servier; and consulting fees from Servier. A.K. declares support for the present manuscript from Servier; consulting fees from Servier; and payment or honoraria from Servier, Novartis, KRKA, and Shtada. L.D.E. and V.P. have no conflicts of interest. C.B. declares support for the present manuscript from Servier; consulting fees from Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Alfasigma, Gilead, Recordati, Novartis, and Amarin; payment or honoraria from Servier, Menarini Asia-Pacific, Berlin Chemie, Novo Nordisk, and Gilead; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Alfasigma, Amarin, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Novartis.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Identification of patients with PER/IND/AML multiple-pill vs. single-pill formulation. ∗Post-PSM. AML, amlodipine; IND, indapamide; PER, perindopril.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Adherence to treatment in patients under multiple-pill vs. SPC, post-PDM. PDC, proportion of days covered; PSM, propensity score matching.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Incidence rate of death (a) and death/CV events (composite endpoint) (b) in patients under multiple-pill vs. SPC, post-PSM, during 1-year follow-up. CV events: ischemic heart, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease. CV, cardiovascular; PSM, propensity score matching.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Average annual direct healthcare costs in patients under multiple-pill vs. single-pill formulation, post-PSM. Total costs (average annual direct healthcare costs) included the sum of all drugs, all-cause hospitalizations and all outpatient services. CV, cardiovascular; PSM, propensity score matching.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. GBD Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet 2020; 396:1223–1249. - PMC - PubMed
    1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet 2021; 398:957–980. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists Collaboration. Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis. Lancet 2021; 397:1625–1636. - PMC - PubMed
    1. SPRINT Research Group. Final report of a trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med 2021; 384:1921–1930. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. . 2018 esc/esh guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 2018; 39:3021–3104. - PubMed

Publication types