Hydrodynamic Flow Characteristics of a Recirculating Pool: Examining the Ecological Validity for Training and Testing
- PMID: 37729515
- DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004500
Hydrodynamic Flow Characteristics of a Recirculating Pool: Examining the Ecological Validity for Training and Testing
Abstract
Krajewski, KT, Beethe, AZ, Dever, DE, Johnson, CD, Nindl, BC, Lovalekar, MT, Flanagan, SD, and Connaboy, C. Hydrodynamic flow characteristics of a recirculating pool: examining the ecological validity for training and testing. J Strength Cond Res 37(10): 2023-2031, 2023-Recirculating swimming flumes (RSFs) with elliptical multifeature designs have grown in popularity due to their multifunctionality for rehabilitation and training. Because of their smaller footprint, laboratories have adopted their use to investigate swimming and underwater treadmill running. However, little is known about the hydrodynamic characteristics of these RSFs and how they might influence outcomes. The purpose was to determine hydrodynamic flow characteristics of an RSF at the manufacturers' set "speeds" around the centroid of flow projection. Hydrodynamic velocity profiles were collected through a 3D profiling velocimeter, sampling at 200 Hz in an RSF. Data were collected 0.5 and 1.5 m from the projection channel at designated flume "speeds" of 30-95 (+99) in 5-unit increments. Velocity data were collected for 1 minute per trial (location × speed) to determine mean flow velocity (MFV) for 10, 20, 30, and 40 cm2 cross-sectional areas (CSAs). A two-way ANOVA was conducted comparing CSAs from the surface by distance from the current channel (4 × 2). Separate ANOVAs were conducted to assess differences in MFV across each CSA. Significant differences between flow CSAs indicated that MFV is less for a larger area at the same speed, indicative of variable and turbulent flow characteristics across the respective CSAs. Mean flow velocity was further diminished by distance from the flow channel as supported by the main effect, thus exposing an individual to variant flow velocities simultaneously. Limited stability of the flow velocity centroid could affect swim mechanics making the movement pattern no longer analogous to traditional pool and open water swimming, rather resembling swimming upstream in a river with turbulent flow.
Copyright © 2023 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
References
-
- Andrews C, Bakewell J, Scurr JC. Comparison of advanced and intermediate 200 m backstroke swimmers' dominant and non-dominant shoulder entry angles across various swimming speeds. J Sports Sci 29: 743–748, 2011.
-
- Astrand PO, Englesson S. A swimming flume. J Appl Physiol 33: 514, 1972.
-
- Baxi G, Palekar T, Nair M, Basu S, Gohil D. Effect of underwater treadmill training on cardiovascular responses in normal and overweight individuals. Natl J Integrated Res Med 9: 13–19, 2018.
-
- Berger MA, Hollander AP, de Groot G. Determining propulsive force in front crawl swimming: A comparison of two methods. J Sports Sci 17: 97–105, 1999.
-
- Bressel E, Wing JE, Miller AI, Dolny DG. High-intensity interval training on an aquatic treadmill in adults with osteoarthritis: Effect on pain, balance, function, and mobility. J Strength Cond Res 28: 2088–2096, 2014.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources