Young people's opinions of cancer care in England: the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort
- PMID: 37730384
- PMCID: PMC10514633
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069910
Young people's opinions of cancer care in England: the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort
Abstract
Objectives: The BRIGHTLIGHT cohort study was the national evaluation of cancer services for teenager and young adults (TYA). This was analysis of free-text survey data to better understand their experiences of cancer care.
Design: Cohort study SETTING: National Health Service hospitals delivering cancer care in England PARTICIPANTS: 830 young people newly diagnosed with cancer.
Interventions: Exposure to specialist care in the first 6 months after diagnosis defined as care in a TYA Principal Treatment Centre (PTC). This was categorised as follows: all care in a TYA-PTC (ALL-TYA-PTC), no care in a TYA-PTC (NO-TYA-PTC) so care delivered in a children/adult unit only and some care in a TYA-PTC with additional care in a children's/adult unit (SOME-TYA-PTC).
Primary outcome: Data were collected through the BRIGHTLIGHT survey included free-text questions which asked patients 'what was the best aspects of their experiences of care' and 'what aspects could be improved'. These comments were analysed using content analysis. Themes were compared between categories of care, then ranked in order of frequency, ranging from the most endorsed to the least.
Results: Overall, young people were most positive about their healthcare team, while the area highlighted for improvement was diagnostic experience. Differences between the three groups suggested those who had some or all treatment in a TYA-PTC valued the place of care. Regardless of where TYA were treated their healthcare teams were favourably viewed. Age appropriate place of care was highlighted to be of value for those in PTCs.
Conclusions: These data show the value young people placed on the care they received in TYA specific wards. Young people who accessed some or all of their care in a TYA-PTC highly endorsed their place of care as one of the best elements of their care, and it is further emphasised by those who had shared care who experienced difficulty with lack of age-appropriate care when treated outside the TYA-PTC.
Keywords: Adolescent; ONCOLOGY; Organisational development.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Processes of care and survival associated with treatment in specialist teenage and young adult cancer centres: results from the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort study.BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 7;11(4):e044854. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044854. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33827838 Free PMC article.
-
Longitudinal cohort study of the impact of specialist cancer services for teenagers and young adults on quality of life: outcomes from the BRIGHTLIGHT study.BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 26;10(11):e038471. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038471. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33243793 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Specialist Care on Teenage and Young Adult Patient-Reported Outcomes in England: A BRIGHTLIGHT Study.J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2024 Jun;13(3):492-501. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0141. Epub 2024 Jan 30. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38285524
-
Policy and practice in teenage and young adult cancer care in England: looking to the future.Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009 Jul;13(3):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2009.05.003. Epub 2009 Jul 4. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19577960 Review.
-
Improving outcomes for teenagers and young adults (TYA) with cancer.Klin Padiatr. 2013 Nov;225(6):331-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1358392. Epub 2013 Oct 28. Klin Padiatr. 2013. PMID: 24166095 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of specialist cancer services for teenagers and young adults in England: interpreting BRIGHTLIGHT study results through the lens of young people with cancer.Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 29;11(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00739-7. Res Involv Engagem. 2025. PMID: 40442843 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Affecting Psychosocial Distress in Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: BRIGHTLIGHT Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Cohort Study Results.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;17(7):1196. doi: 10.3390/cancers17071196. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40227784 Free PMC article.
-
Longitudinal Cohort Study of the Relationship Between Illness Perception, Perceived Social Support, and Psychosocial Quality of Life in Adolescents and Young Adults Newly Diagnosed with Cancer: Outcomes from a BRIGHTLIGHT Study.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 9;17(12):1918. doi: 10.3390/cancers17121918. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40563568 Free PMC article.
-
When Research Evidence and Healthcare Policy Collide: Synergising Results and Policy into BRIGHTLIGHT Guidance to Improve Coordinated Care for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 26;13(15):1821. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151821. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40805854 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pitch N, Stefaniuk S, MacMillan M, et al. . Looking back to move forward: lessons learned from a successful, sustainable, Replicable model of adolescent and young adult program of a tertiary cancer care center. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology 2022;11:181–8. 10.1089/jayao.2021.0156 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical