Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 20;15(1):114.
doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00732-1.

Intrinsic variables associated with low back pain and lumbar spine injury in fast bowlers in cricket: a systematic review

Patrick Farhart  1   2   3   4 , David Beakley  5 , Ashish Diwan  6   7 , Rob Duffield  8 , Elizabeth Pickering Rodriguez  8 , Uphar Chamoli  6   9 , Mark Watsford  8
Affiliations

Intrinsic variables associated with low back pain and lumbar spine injury in fast bowlers in cricket: a systematic review

Patrick Farhart et al. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. .

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spine injuries in fast bowlers account for the greatest missed playing time in cricket. A range of extrinsic and intrinsic variables are hypothesised to be associated with low back pain and lumbar spine injury in fast bowlers, and an improved understanding of intrinsic variables is necessary as these may alter load tolerance and injury risk associated with fast bowling. This review critically evaluated studies reporting intrinsic variables associated with low back pain and lumbar spine injury in fast bowlers and identified areas for future investigation.

Methods: OVID Medline, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Web of Science and SCOPUS databases were last searched on 3 June 2022 to identify studies investigating intrinsic variables associated with low back pain and lumbar spine injury in cricket fast bowlers. Terms relevant to cricket fast bowling, and intrinsic variables associated with lumbar spine injury and low back pain in fast bowlers were searched. 1,503 abstracts were screened, and 118 full-text articles were appraised to determine whether they met inclusion criteria. Two authors independently screened search results and assessed risk of bias using a modified version of the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool.

Results: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, no included studies demonstrated a low risk of bias, two studies were identified as moderate risk, and twenty-three studies were identified as high risk. Conflicting results were reported amongst studies investigating associations of fast bowling kinematics and kinetics, trunk and lumbar anatomical features, anthropometric traits, age, and neuromuscular characteristics with low back pain and lumbar spine injury.

Conclusion: Inconsistencies in results may be related to differences in study design, injury definitions, participant characteristics, measurement parameters, and statistical analyses. Low back pain and lumbar spine injury occurrence in fast bowlers remain high, and this may be due to an absence of low bias studies that have informed recommendations for their prevention. Future research should employ clearly defined injury outcomes, analyse continuous datasets, utilise models that better represent lumbar kinematics and kinetics during fast bowling, and better quantify previous injury, lumbar anatomical features and lumbar maturation.

Trial registration: Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ERKZ2 .

Keywords: Fast bowling; Intrinsic variables; Kinematics; Kinetics; Low back pain; Lumbar spine injury; Neuromuscular; Radiology; Technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of search and included studies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
QUIPS risk of bias domain judgements presented as percentages across included studies
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Orchard JW, Kountouris A, Sims K. Incidence and prevalence of elite male cricket injuries using updated consensus definitions. Open Access J Sport Med. 2016;7:187–194. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S117497. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kurittu E, Vasankari T, Brinck T, Parkkari J, Heinonen OJ, Kannus P, Hänninen T, Köhler K, Leppänen M. Injury incidence and prevalence in Finnish top-level football–one-season prospective cohort study. Sci Med Football. 2022;6(2):141–147. doi: 10.1080/24733938.2021.1917775. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moore IS, Ranson C, Mathema P. Injury risk in international rugby union: three-year injury surveillance of the Welsh national team. Orthop J Sport Med. 2015;3(7):2325967115596194. doi: 10.1177/2325967115596194. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Orchard JW, Blanch P, Paoloni J, Kountouris A, Sims K, Orchard JJ, Brukner P. Cricket fast bowling workload patterns as risk factors for tendon, muscle, bone and joint injuries. Br J Sport Med. 2015;49(16):1064–1068. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093683. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartlett RM, Stockill NP, Elliott BC, Burnett AF. The biomechanics of fast bowling in men’s cricket: a review. J Sport Sci. 1996;14(5):403–424. doi: 10.1080/02640419608727727. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources