Scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfecta: identifying the genetic and non-genetic factors affecting severity and progression from longitudinal data of 290 patients
- PMID: 37730650
- PMCID: PMC10510243
- DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02906-z
Scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfecta: identifying the genetic and non-genetic factors affecting severity and progression from longitudinal data of 290 patients
Abstract
Background: Scoliosis is widely prevalent among osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) patients, and is progressive with age. However, factors affecting scoliosis in OI are not well known.
Methods: We retrospectively retrieved longitudinal radiographic and clinical records of consecutive OI patients seeking treatments at our hospital from 2014 to 2022, graded their pre-operative spinal conditions into four outcome groups, estimated their progression rates, and descriptively and inferentially analyzed the genetic and non-genetic factors that may affect the outcomes and progression rates.
Results: In all, 290 OI patients met the inclusion criteria, where 221 had genetic records. Of these 221, about 2/3 had mutations in COL1A1 or COL1A2, followed by mutations in WNT1 (9.0%), IFITM5 (9.0%) and other OI risk genes. With an average age of 12.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 6.9-16.1), 70.7% of the cohort had scoliosis (Cobb angle > 10°), including 106 (36.5%) mild (10°-25°), 40 (13.8%) moderate (25°-50°), and 59 (20.3%) severe (> 50°) scoliosis patients. Patients with either COL1A1 and COL1A2 were strongly biased toward having mild or no scoliosis, whereas patients with mutations in IFITM5, WNT1 and other recessive genes were more evenly distributed among the four outcome grades. Lower-limb discrepancy, bone mineral density (BMD) and age of first drug used were all significantly correlated with severity outcomes. Using multivariate logistic regression, we estimated that each year older adds an odds ratio of 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.2) in progression into advanced stages of scoliosis. We estimated a cohort-wide progression rate of 2.7 degrees per year (95% CI 2.4-3.0). Early-onset patients experienced fast progressions during both infantile and adolescent stages. Twenty-five of the 59 (42.8%) patients with severe scoliosis underwent spinal surgeries, enjoying an average Cobb angle reduction of 33° (IQR 23-40) postoperatively.
Conclusion: The severity and progression of scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfecta were affected by genetic factors including genotypes and mutation types, and non-genetic factors including age and BMD. As compared with COL1A1, mutations in COL1A2 were less damaging while those on IFITM5 and other recessive genes conferred damaging effects. Progression rates were the fastest in the adolescent adult age-group.
Keywords: Genetics; Logistic regression; Multivariate regression; Osteogenesis imperfecta; Progression rate; Scoliosis.
© 2023. Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have any competing interest.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfecta caused by COL1A1/COL1A2 mutations - genotype-phenotype correlations and effect of bisphosphonate treatment.Bone. 2016 May;86:53-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Feb 27. Bone. 2016. PMID: 26927310
-
Correlation of scoliotic curvature with Z-score bone mineral density and body mass index in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Aug 1;32(17):E488-94. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811ec2d9. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. PMID: 17762282
-
Skeletal clinical characteristics of osteogenesis imperfecta caused by haploinsufficiency mutations in COL1A1.J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Sep;28(9):2001-7. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1942. J Bone Miner Res. 2013. PMID: 23529829
-
Pediatric cervical kyphosis in the MRI era (1984-2008) with long-term follow up: literature review.Childs Nerv Syst. 2022 Feb;38(2):361-377. doi: 10.1007/s00381-021-05409-z. Epub 2021 Nov 22. Childs Nerv Syst. 2022. PMID: 34806157 Review.
-
What is new in genetics and osteogenesis imperfecta classification?J Pediatr (Rio J). 2014 Nov-Dec;90(6):536-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jul 18. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2014. PMID: 25046257 Review.
Cited by
-
Lumbar Epidural versus Caudal Epidural for Postoperative Analgesia After Lower Extremity Osteotomy Surgery in Pediatric Patients with Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis in a Single-Center Over 9 Years.J Pain Res. 2024 Aug 13;17:2645-2656. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S466745. eCollection 2024. J Pain Res. 2024. PMID: 39155955 Free PMC article.
-
TBS as a complementary tool for assessing vertebral fractures and spinal deformity in children and adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta.Osteoporos Int. 2025 Apr;36(4):725-735. doi: 10.1007/s00198-025-07423-2. Epub 2025 Feb 24. Osteoporos Int. 2025. PMID: 39994027 Free PMC article.
-
Comprehensive Review of Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Current Treatments and Future Innovations.Hum Gene Ther. 2025 Mar;36(5-6):597-617. doi: 10.1089/hum.2024.191. Epub 2025 Feb 11. Hum Gene Ther. 2025. PMID: 39932815 Review.
-
Unraveling the Link of Altered TGFβ Signaling with Scoliotic Vertebral Malformations in Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Comprehensive Review.J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 14;13(12):3484. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123484. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38930011 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous