Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 20;15(8):e43808.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.43808. eCollection 2023 Aug.

Comparison of Force During the Endotracheal Intubation of Commercial Simulation Manikins

Affiliations

Comparison of Force During the Endotracheal Intubation of Commercial Simulation Manikins

Kate E Hughes et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background Medical simulation allows clinicians to safely practice the procedural skill of endotracheal intubation. Applied force to oropharyngeal structures increases the risk of patient harm, and video laryngoscopy (VL) requires less force to obtain a glottic view. It is unknown how much force is required to obtain a glottic view using commercially available simulation manikins and if variability exists. This study compares laryngoscopy force for a modified Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade I view in both normal and difficult airway scenarios between three commercially available simulation manikins. Methods Experienced clinicians (≥2 years experience) were recruited to participate from critical care, emergency medicine, and anesthesia specialties. A C-MAC size 3 VL blade was equipped with five force resistor reading (FSR) sensors (four concave surfaces, one convex), measuring resistance (Ohms) in response to applied pressure (1-100 Newtons). The study occurred in a university simulation lab. Using a randomized sequence, 49 physicians performed intubations on three manikins (Laerdal SimMan 3GPlus, Gaumard Hal S3201, CAE Apollo) in normal and difficult airway scenarios. The outcomes were sensor mean pressure, peak force, and CL grade. Summary statistics were calculated. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) conducted for both scenarios assessed changes in pressure measured in three manikins while accounting for correlated responses of individuals assigned in random order. Paired t-test assessed for the in-manikin difference between scenarios. STATA/BE v17 (R) was used for analysis; results interpreted at type I error alpha is 0.05. Results Participants included 49 experienced clinicians. Mean years' experience was 4(±6.6); median prior intubations were 80 (IQR 50-400). Mean individual sensor pressure varied within scenarios depending on manikin (p<0.001). Higher mean forces were used in difficult scenarios (603.4±128.9, 611.1±101.4, 467.5±72.4 FSR) than normal (462.5±121.9, 596.0±90.5, 290.6±63.2 FSR) for each manikin (p<0.001). All manikins required more peak force in the difficult scenario (p<0.03). The highest mean forces (Laerdal, CAE, difficult scenario) were associated with the higher frequency of grade 2A views (p<0.001). The Gaumard manikin was rated most realistic in terms of force required to intubate. Conclusion Commercially available high-fidelity manikins had significant variability in laryngoscopy force in both normal and difficult airway scenarios. In difficult airway scenarios, significant variability existed in CL grade between manikin brands. Experienced clinicians rated Gaumard Hal as the most realistic force applied during endotracheal intubation.

Keywords: cormack-lehane grade; experienced clinicians; intubation force; intubation simulation; simulation trainer; video laryngoscopy (vl).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A. Modified C-MAC pressure sensing module B. Pressure sensing module circuit diagram
FSR, force resistor reading

References

    1. Failure to achieve first attempt success at intubation using video laryngoscopy is associated with increased complications. Hypes C, Sakles J, Joshi R, et al. Intern Emerg Med. 2017;12:1235–1243. - PubMed
    1. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Mort TC. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:607–613. - PubMed
    1. Tracheal intubation in the critically ill. Where we came from and where we should go. Mosier JM, Sakles JC, Law JA, Brown CA 3rd, Brindley PG. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201:775–788. - PubMed
    1. The importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Sakles JC, Chiu S, Mosier J, Walker C, Stolz U. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20:71–78. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neurocirculatory responses to intubation with either an endotracheal tube or a laryngeal mask airway in humans. Akbar AN, Muzi M, Lopatka CW, Ebert TJ. J Clin Anesth. 1996;8:194–197. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources