Retrospective study and outcome of 307 cats with feline infectious peritonitis treated with legally sourced veterinary compounded preparations of remdesivir and GS-441524 (2020-2022)
- PMID: 37732386
- PMCID: PMC10812036
- DOI: 10.1177/1098612X231194460
Retrospective study and outcome of 307 cats with feline infectious peritonitis treated with legally sourced veterinary compounded preparations of remdesivir and GS-441524 (2020-2022)
Abstract
Objectives: Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is a serious disease that arises due to feline coronavirus infection. The nucleoside analogues remdesivir and GS-441524 can be effective in its treatment, but most studies have used unregulated products of unknown composition. The aim of the present study was to describe the treatment of FIP using legally sourced veterinary-prescribed regulated veterinary compounded products containing known amounts of remdesivir (injectable) or GS-441524 (oral tablets).
Methods: Cats were recruited via email advice services, product sales contacts and study publicity. Cats were excluded if they were deemed unlikely to have FIP, were not treated exclusively with the veterinary compounded products, or if there was a lack of cat and/or treatment (including response) data. Extensive cat and treatment data were collected.
Results: Among the 307 cats recruited, the predominant type of FIP was most commonly abdominal effusive (49.5%) and then neurological (14.3%). Three treatment protocols were used; remdesivir alone (33.9%), remdesivir followed by GS-441524 (55.7%) and GS-441524 alone (10.4%). The median (range) initial treatment period duration and longest follow-up time point after starting treatment were 84 (1-330) days and 248 (1-814) days, respectively. The most common side effect was injection pain (in 47.8% of those given subcutaneous remdesivir). Of the 307 cats, 33 (10.8%) relapsed, 15 (45.5%) during and 18 (54.5%) after the initial treatment period. At the longest follow-up time point after completion of the initial treatment period, 84.4% of cats were alive. The cats achieving a complete response within 30 days of starting treatment were significantly more likely to be alive at the end of the initial treatment period than those cats that did not.
Conclusions and relevance: Legally sourced remdesivir and GS-441524 products, either alone or used sequentially, were very effective in the treatment of FIP in this group of cats. Variable protocols precluded statistical comparison of treatment regimens.
Keywords: Survival; antiviral; coronavirus; nucleoside analogue.
Conflict of interest statement
No external companies had any role in the writing of, or in the decision to publish, the research presented. All of the research was performed by the authors independently. ENB, DGM, SC and SST had all funds from BOVA for the provision of continuous professional development material on FIP (articles, webinars, conference presentations) donated to a fund for FIP research. ENB, DGM, SS, SST and ST comprise a group of five RCVS recognised specialists in feline and internal medicine who run a free-of-charge email advice line on FIP for veterinarians to aid with the diagnosis of FIP and its treatment. Individual authors have been consultants for, or received research funding and honoraria from, various commercial companies and other organisations; full details available on request.
Figures





References
-
- Kipar A, Meli ML. Feline infectious peritonitis: still an enigma? Vet Path 2014; 51: 505–526. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous