Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 21;18(9):e0291984.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291984. eCollection 2023.

"I'd rather wait and see what's around the corner": A multi-perspective qualitative study of treatment escalation planning in frailty

Adam Lound  1 , Jane Bruton  1 , Kathryn Jones  1 , Nira Shah  2 , Barry Williams  2 , Jamie Gross  3 , Benjamin Post  4   5 , Sophie Day  1 , Stephen J Brett  6   7 , Helen Ward  1   7   8
Affiliations

"I'd rather wait and see what's around the corner": A multi-perspective qualitative study of treatment escalation planning in frailty

Adam Lound et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: People living with frailty risk adverse outcomes following even minor illnesses. Admission to hospital or the intensive care unit is associated with potentially burdensome interventions and poor outcomes. Decision-making during an emergency is fraught with complexity and potential for conflict between patients, carers and clinicians. Advance care planning is a process of shared decision-making which aims to ensure patients are treated in line with their wishes. However, planning for future care is challenging and those living with frailty are rarely given the opportunity to discuss their preferences. The aim of the ProsPECT (Prospective Planning for Escalation of Care and Treatment) study was to explore perspectives on planning for treatment escalation in the context of frailty. We spoke to people living with frailty, their carers and clinicians across primary and secondary care.

Methods: In-depth online or telephone interviews and online focus groups. The topic guide explored frailty, acute decision-making and planning for the future. Data were thematically analysed using the Framework Method. Preliminary findings were presented to a sample of study participants for feedback in two online workshops.

Results: We spoke to 44 participants (9 patients, 11 carers and 24 clinicians). Four main themes were identified: frailty is absent from treatment escalation discussions, planning for an uncertain future, escalation in an acute crisis is 'the path of least resistance', and approaches to facilitating treatment escalation planning in frailty.

Conclusion: Barriers to treatment escalation planning include a lack of shared understanding of frailty and uncertainty about the future. Emergency decision-making is focussed on survival or risk aversion and patient preferences are rarely considered. To improve planning discussions, we recommend frailty training for non-specialist clinicians, multi-disciplinary support, collaborative working between patients, carers and clinicians as well as broader public engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Summary of themes and subthemes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013. Mar 2;381(9868):752–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanlon P, Nicholl BI, Jani BD, Lee D, McQueenie R, Mair FS. Frailty and pre-frailty in middle-aged and older adults and its association with multimorbidity and mortality: a prospective analysis of 493 737 UK Biobank participants. The Lancet Public Health. 2018. Jul;3(7):e323–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hogan DB, Maxwell CJ, Afilalo J, Arora RC, Bagshaw SM, Basran J, et al.. A Scoping Review of Frailty and Acute Care in Middle-Aged and Older Individuals with Recommendations for Future Research. Can Geri J [Internet]. 2017. Jan 27 [cited 2022 Jul 28];20(1). Available from: https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj/article/view/240 doi: 10.5770/cgj.20.240 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muscedere J, Waters B, Varambally A, Bagshaw SM, Boyd JG, Maslove D, et al.. The impact of frailty on intensive care unit outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2017. Aug;43(8):1105–22. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4867-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Biasio JC, Mittel AM, Mueller AL, Ferrante LE, Kim DH, Shaefi S. Frailty in Critical Care Medicine: A Review. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2020. Jun;130(6):1462–73. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004665 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types