Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 21;18(9):e0291016.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291016. eCollection 2023.

Demographic and psychometric predictors associated with engagement in risk-associated alternative healthcare behaviours

Affiliations

Demographic and psychometric predictors associated with engagement in risk-associated alternative healthcare behaviours

Bernie Garrett et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

This paper builds on prior work exploring the use of risk-associated alternative healthcare (RAAH) in Canada. RAAH uptake was surveyed to explore the characteristics of adult RAAH users and the value of established psychometric instruments previously used in alternative healthcare studies in predicting RAAH behaviours: the Control Beliefs Inventory (CBI), the Reward Responsiveness Behavioural Activation System (RBAS) scale, the Positive Attitudes to Science (PAS) scale, the Satisfaction with Orthodox Medicine (SOM) scale, and the brief version of the Susceptibility to Persuasion-II (StP-II-B) scale. Findings suggest RAAH is influenced by gender, age, income, education, employment, chronic illness status, and ethnicity. Engagement in some form of RAAH was common (around 40%) and the most common types of RAAH use reported were physical manipulation and herbal/nutritional supplement use. Other higher-risk AH activities (such as use of toxins and physically invasive procedures) were also reported by about 5% of respondents. The StP-II-B and PAS instruments were predictive of the likelihood of engagement in RAAH behaviours, as illustrated by higher risk tolerance, desire for novelty, positive attitude to advertising and social influence, and positive beliefs about science. The CBI, RBAS, and SOM instruments were not predictive overall. However, the CBI and SOM instruments were predictive of engagement with physical manipulative RAAH activities, while the RBAS was predictive of herbal/nutritional RAAH engagement. These findings can help inform health professionals' understanding of public health-seeking behaviours with respect to risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ernst E. Harmless herbs? A review of the recent literature. Am J Med. 1998;104: 170–178. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00397-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garrett B, Caulfield T, Murdoch B, Brignall M, Kapur AK, Murphy S, et al.. A taxonomy of risk-associated alternative health practices: A Delphi study. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30: 1163–1181. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13386 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Offit PA. Studying complementary and alternative therapies. JAMA. 2012;307: 1803–1804. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.518 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thorne S, Paterson B, Russell C, Schultz A. Complementary/alternative medicine in chronic illness as informed self-care decision making. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002;39: 671–683. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(02)00005-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Complementary, Alternative, or Integrative Health: What’s In a Name? In: NCCIH Health Information [Internet]. 2021 [cited 8 Oct 2022]. Available from: https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/complementary-alternative-or-integrativ...

Publication types