Demographic and psychometric predictors associated with engagement in risk-associated alternative healthcare behaviours
- PMID: 37733748
- PMCID: PMC10513319
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291016
Demographic and psychometric predictors associated with engagement in risk-associated alternative healthcare behaviours
Abstract
This paper builds on prior work exploring the use of risk-associated alternative healthcare (RAAH) in Canada. RAAH uptake was surveyed to explore the characteristics of adult RAAH users and the value of established psychometric instruments previously used in alternative healthcare studies in predicting RAAH behaviours: the Control Beliefs Inventory (CBI), the Reward Responsiveness Behavioural Activation System (RBAS) scale, the Positive Attitudes to Science (PAS) scale, the Satisfaction with Orthodox Medicine (SOM) scale, and the brief version of the Susceptibility to Persuasion-II (StP-II-B) scale. Findings suggest RAAH is influenced by gender, age, income, education, employment, chronic illness status, and ethnicity. Engagement in some form of RAAH was common (around 40%) and the most common types of RAAH use reported were physical manipulation and herbal/nutritional supplement use. Other higher-risk AH activities (such as use of toxins and physically invasive procedures) were also reported by about 5% of respondents. The StP-II-B and PAS instruments were predictive of the likelihood of engagement in RAAH behaviours, as illustrated by higher risk tolerance, desire for novelty, positive attitude to advertising and social influence, and positive beliefs about science. The CBI, RBAS, and SOM instruments were not predictive overall. However, the CBI and SOM instruments were predictive of engagement with physical manipulative RAAH activities, while the RBAS was predictive of herbal/nutritional RAAH engagement. These findings can help inform health professionals' understanding of public health-seeking behaviours with respect to risk.
Copyright: © 2023 Garrett et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Public perceptions of Internet-based health scams, and factors that promote engagement with them.Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Sep;27(5):e672-e686. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12772. Epub 2019 Jun 13. Health Soc Care Community. 2019. PMID: 31194273
-
The impact of a patient's engagement in their health on the magnitude of limitations and experience following upper limb fractures.Bone Joint J. 2020 Jan;102-B(1):42-47. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B1.BJJ-2019-0421.R1. Bone Joint J. 2020. PMID: 31888361
-
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Version of the Cancer Behavior Inventory-Brief Version.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Dec;54(6):929-935. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Aug 12. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017. PMID: 28807698
-
Influences on NHS Health Check behaviours: a systematic review.BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):1359. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09365-2. BMC Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32938432 Free PMC article.
-
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9. Encephale. 2004. PMID: 15627048 Review. French.
References
-
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Complementary, Alternative, or Integrative Health: What’s In a Name? In: NCCIH Health Information [Internet]. 2021 [cited 8 Oct 2022]. Available from: https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/complementary-alternative-or-integrativ...
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical