Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct:96:104803.
doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104803. Epub 2023 Sep 19.

Efficacy of metformin targets on cardiometabolic health in the general population and non-diabetic individuals: a Mendelian randomization study

Affiliations

Efficacy of metformin targets on cardiometabolic health in the general population and non-diabetic individuals: a Mendelian randomization study

Jie Zheng et al. EBioMedicine. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Metformin shows beneficial effects on cardiometabolic health in diabetic individuals. However, the beneficial effects in the general population, especially in non-diabetic individuals are unclear. We aim to estimate the effects of perturbation of seven metformin targets on cardiometabolic health using Mendelian randomization (MR).

Methods: Genetic variants close to metformin-targeted genes associated with expression of the corresponding genes and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level were used to proxy therapeutic effects of seven metformin-related drug targets. Eight cardiometabolic phenotypes under metformin trials were selected as outcomes (average N = 466,947). MR estimates representing the weighted average effects of the seven effects of metformin targets on the eight outcomes were generated. One-sample MR was applied to estimate the averaged and target-specific effects in 338,425 non-diabetic individuals in UK Biobank.

Findings: Genetically proxied averaged effects of five metformin targets, equivalent to a 0.62% reduction of HbA1c level, was associated with 37.8% lower risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.46-0.84), lower levels of body mass index (BMI) (β = -0.22, 95% CI = -0.35 to -0.09), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (β = -0.19, 95% CI = -0.28 to -0.09) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels (β = -0.29, 95% CI = -0.39 to -0.19). One-sample MR suggested that the seven metformin targets showed averaged and target-specific beneficial effects on BMI, SBP and DBP in non-diabetic individuals.

Interpretation: This study showed that perturbation of seven metformin targets has beneficial effects on BMI and blood pressure in non-diabetic individuals. Clinical trials are needed to investigate whether similar effects can be achieved with metformin medications.

Funding: Funding information is provided in the Acknowledgements.

Keywords: Cardiometabolic diseases; General population; Mendelian randomization; Metformin targets; Non-diabetic individuals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests T.R.G, J.Z. and G.D.S have received research funding from various pharmaceutical companies to support the application of Mendelian randomization to drug target prioritization. G.D.S. reports Scientific Advisory Board Membership for Relation Therapeutics and Insitro. M.V.H. is presently employed by 23andMe and holds stock in the company, and has previously consulted for Boehringer Ingelheim. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Genetic instrument selection, data sources, and analysis strategy in a study of the lifelong effect of genetically proxied perturbation of metformin targets on cardiometabolic phenotypes.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effects of perturbation of metformin targets and lowering of circulating HbA1clevels on(a)coronary artery disease,(b)body mass index,(c)systolic blood pressure and(d)diastolic blood pressure in the general population. Both effect of perturbation of metformin and circulating HbA1c effect were scaled to the same unit of 0.62% lowering of HbA1c (which refers to 1 SD unit of HbA1c levels) to allow direct comparison of the MR estimates.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Triangulation of clinical trial/observational and genetic evidence for perturbation of metformin targets on body mass index and diastolic blood pressure. (a) The effect of perturbation of metformin targets on body mass index; (b) the effect of perturbation of metformin targets on systolic blood pressure; (c) the effect of perturbation of metformin targets on diastolic blood pressure. The clinical trial (RCT) or observational (observed) effect size and genetic (MR) effect size were re-scaled to the same unit, so these pieces of evidence are comparable.

References

    1. Wilcox T., De Block C., Schwartzbard A.Z., Newman J.D. Diabetic agents, from metformin to SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists: JACC focus seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:1956–1974. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bailey C.J. Metformin: historical overview. Diabetologia. 2017;60:1566–1576. - PubMed
    1. Zhu J., Yu X., Zheng Y., et al. Association of glucose-lowering medications with cardiovascular outcomes: an umbrella review and evidence map. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8:192–205. - PubMed
    1. Wu T., Trahair L.G., Little T.J., et al. Effects of vildagliptin and metformin on blood pressure and heart rate responses to small intestinal glucose in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:702–705. - PubMed
    1. Preiss D., Lloyd S.M., Ford I., et al. Metformin for non-diabetic patients with coronary heart disease (the CAMERA study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:116–124. - PubMed