Suboptimal gestational weight gain and neonatal outcomes in low and middle income countries: individual participant data meta-analysis
- PMID: 37734757
- PMCID: PMC10512803
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072249
Suboptimal gestational weight gain and neonatal outcomes in low and middle income countries: individual participant data meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the associations between gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in low and middle income countries.
Design: Individual participant data meta-analysis.
Setting: Prospective pregnancy studies from 24 low and middle income countries.
Main outcome measures: Nine neonatal outcomes related to timing (preterm birth) and anthropometry (weight, length, and head circumference) at birth, stillbirths, and neonatal death.
Analysis methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science which identified 53 prospective pregnancy studies published after the year 2000 with data on GWG, timing and anthropometry at birth, and neonatal mortality. GWG adequacy was defined as the ratio of the observed maternal weight gain over the recommended weight gain based on the Institute of Medicine body mass index specific guidelines, which are derived from data in high income settings, and the INTERGROWTH-21st GWG standards. Study specific estimates, adjusted for confounders, were generated and then pooled using random effects meta-analysis models. Maternal age and body mass index before pregnancy were examined as potential modifiers of the associations between GWG adequacy and neonatal outcomes.
Results: Overall, 55% of participants had severely inadequate (<70%) or moderately inadequate (70% to <90%) GWG, 22% had adequate GWG (90-125%), and 23% had excessive GWG (≥125%). Severely inadequate GWG was associated with a higher risk of low birthweight (adjusted relative risk 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.51 to 1.72; 48 studies, 93 337 participants; τ2=0.006), small for gestational age (1.44, 1.36 to 1.54; 51 studies, 93 191 participants; τ2=0.016), short for gestational age (1.47, 1.29 to 1.69; 40 studies, 83 827 participants; τ2=0.074), and microcephaly (1.57, 1.31 to 1.88; 31 studies, 80 046 participants; τ2=0.145) compared with adequate GWG. Excessive GWG was associated with a higher risk of preterm birth (1.22, 1.13 to 1.31; 48 studies, 103 762 participants; τ2=0.008), large for gestational age (1.44, 1.33 to 1.57; 47 studies, 90 044 participants; τ2=0.009), and macrosomia (1.52, 1.33 to 1.73; 29 studies, 68 138 participants; τ2=0) compared with adequate GWG. The direction and magnitude of the associations between GWG adequacy and several neonatal outcomes were modified by maternal age and body mass index before pregnancy.
Conclusions: Inadequate and excessive GWG are associated with a higher risk of adverse neonatal outcomes across settings. Interventions to promote optimal GWG during pregnancy are likely to reduce the burden of adverse neonatal outcomes, however further research is needed to assess optimal ranges of GWG based on data from low and middle income countries.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: financial support for the submitted work from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the National Institutes of Health, the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme and the Spanish Government, the UK Medical Research Council and the Department for International Development (DFID) under the MRC/DFID Concordat agreement, the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Maria Cecilia Souto Vidigal Foundation Brazil, São Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP), Fondo Nestlé-Funsalud, Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the Wellcome Trust; financial support from the World Health Organization for performance of work for the project ‘Global gestational weight gain standards’ to GK and the Family Larsson-Rosenquist Foundation to SHK; no other associations or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Risk factors for inadequate and excessive gestational weight gain in 25 low- and middle-income countries: An individual-level participant meta-analysis.PLoS Med. 2023 Jul 24;20(7):e1004236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004236. eCollection 2023 Jul. PLoS Med. 2023. PMID: 37486938 Free PMC article.
-
Associations between Gestational Weight Gain Adequacy and Neonatal Outcomes in Tanzania.Ann Nutr Metab. 2022;78(3):156-165. doi: 10.1159/000522197. Epub 2022 Feb 4. Ann Nutr Metab. 2022. PMID: 35124672
-
Gestational weight gain during the second and third trimesters and adverse pregnancy outcomes, results from a prospective pregnancy cohort in urban Tanzania.Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 16;19(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01441-7. Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 35710384 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Association of Antenatal Diet and Physical Activity-Based Interventions With Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Feb 1;182(2):106-114. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6373. JAMA Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 34928300 Free PMC article.
-
Gestational Weight Gain in Twin Pregnancies and Maternal and Child Health: An Updated Systematic Review.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Mar;31(3):362-381. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0009. Epub 2021 Apr 29. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022. PMID: 33926213
Cited by
-
Factors Associated with Anthropometry Z-Scores in Exclusively Breastfed Infants Aged 0-6 Months in 10 Cities of China.Nutrients. 2025 Jun 29;17(13):2163. doi: 10.3390/nu17132163. Nutrients. 2025. PMID: 40647268 Free PMC article.
-
Association between gestational age-specific weight gain in pregnancy and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a secondary analysis of the INTERBIO-21st Fetal Study.Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Jun;121(6):1304-1314. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.04.012. Epub 2025 Apr 16. Am J Clin Nutr. 2025. PMID: 40250762 Free PMC article.
-
Hispanic Views About Online Information on Weight Gain, Diet, and Physical Activity in Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study.Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2025 Apr 17;12:23333936251334514. doi: 10.1177/23333936251334514. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2025. PMID: 40291464 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Higher Than Recommended Gestational Weight Gain on Fetal Growth and Perinatal Risk Factors-The IOM Criteria Reconsidered.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 29;21(2):147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020147. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38397638 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Excessive Gestational Weight Gain on Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review.J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 12;14(4):1197. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041197. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40004727 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Institute of Medicine, National Research Council. Weight Gain during Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines (Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, eds.). The National Academies Press; 2009. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources