Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 21;13(9):e071391.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071391.

Patients' experience of using colonoscopy as a diagnostic test after a positive FOBT/FIT: a systematic review of the quantitative literature

Ghalia Kayal  1 , Robert Kerrison  2 , Yasemin Hirst  3 , Christian von Wagner  4
Affiliations

Patients' experience of using colonoscopy as a diagnostic test after a positive FOBT/FIT: a systematic review of the quantitative literature

Ghalia Kayal et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) are among the most used screening modalities for colorectal cancer (CRC). Colonoscopy is also widely used as a screening and diagnostic test for adults with a positive FOBT/FIT. Patient experience of colonoscopy is an important component for most CRC screening programmes. Individuals with negative experiences are less likely to engage with colonoscopy in the future and can deter others from attending colonoscopy when invited. This review synthesised data on patient experience with colonoscopy, following a positive result, to provide insights into how to improve patient experience within the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO were searched for quantitative questionnaire studies evaluating patient-reported experience with colonoscopy, following a positive screening FOB/FIT result. The search was limited to studies published between 2000 and 2021 (ie, when the first FOBT/FIT screening programmes for CRC were introduced). Data-driven and narrative summary techniques were used to summarise the literature.

Results: In total, six studies from the UK (n=4), Spain (n=1) and the Netherlands (n=1) were included in the review (total participants: 152 329; response rate: 68.0-79.3%). Patient experiences were categorised into three 'stages': 'pre-colonoscopy', 'during the test' and 'post-colonoscopy'. Overall, patients reported a positive experience in all six studies. Bowel preparation was the most frequently endorsed issue experienced pre-test (experienced by 10.0-41.0% of individuals, across all studies), pain and discomfort for during the test (experienced by 10.0-21.0% of participants) and abdominal pain and discomfort after the test (these were experienced by 14.8-22% of patients).

Conclusion: This review highlighted that patient-reported experiences associated with colonoscopy were generally positive. To improve the colonoscopy experience, bowel screening centres should investigate means to: make bowel preparation more acceptable, make colonoscopy less painful and reduce post-colonoscopy symptoms.

Keywords: Cancer pain; Functional bowel disorders; Health Services Accessibility; PUBLIC HEALTH; Quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search strategy and inclusion criteria.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patients’ reported experience outcome. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. PE, Patient Experience.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, et al. . Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut 2017;66:683–91. 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310912 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Power E, Miles A, von Wagner C, et al. . Uptake of colorectal cancer screening: system, provider and individual factors and strategies to improve participation. Future Oncol 5(9) 2009. 10.2217/fon.09.134 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Watson E, et al. . Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (Hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:1541–9. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01875.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Săftoiu A, Hassan C, Areia M, et al. . Role of gastrointestinal endoscopy in the screening of digestive tract cancers in Europe: european society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) position statement. Endoscopy 2020;52:293–304. 10.1055/a-1104-5245 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pham R, Cross S, Fernandez B, et al. . Finding the right FIT”: rural patient preferences for fecal Immunochemical test (FIT) characteristics. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:632–44. 10.3122/jabfm.2017.05.170151 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types