Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 21;24(1):51.
doi: 10.1186/s10195-023-00728-0.

Higher pelvic incidence values are a risk factor for trans-iliac trans-sacral screw malposition in sacroiliac complex fracture treatment

Affiliations

Higher pelvic incidence values are a risk factor for trans-iliac trans-sacral screw malposition in sacroiliac complex fracture treatment

An-Jhih Luo et al. J Orthop Traumatol. .

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous iliosacral (IS) screw fixation and trans-iliac trans-sacral (TITS) screw fixation are clinically effective treatments of posterior pelvic sacroiliac fractures. In order to accurately assess the sacrum position relative to the pelvis, pelvic incidence (PI) is a commonly utilized radiographic parameter in sagittal view. This study aimed to investigate and compare the surgical outcomes and radiographic parameters of IS or TITS screw fixations for the treatment of posterior sacroiliac complex fractures with different PI values.

Materials and methods: The data on patients with posterior pelvic sacroiliac fractures who underwent percutaneous IS or TITS screw fixations, or both, at a single level I trauma center between January 2017 and June 2020 were reviewed. We documented the patient characteristics and fracture types, reviewed surgical records, and measured the radiographic parameters via plain films and multi-planar computed tomography (mpCT) images. Radiographic variations in PI, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, sacral dysmorphism, pelvic ring reduction quality, screw deviation angles, screw malposition grading, and iatrogenic complications were documented and analyzed.

Results: A total of 85 patients were included, and 65 IS and 70 TITS screws were accounted for. Patients were divided into two groups according to screw fixation method and further divided into four sub-groups based on baseline PI values. The PI cutoff values were 49.85° and 48.05° in the IS and TITS screw groups, respectively, according to receiver operating characteristic analysis and Youden's J statistic. Smaller PI values were significantly correlated with sacral dysmorphism (p = 0.027 and 0.003 in the IS and TITS screw groups, respectively). Patients with larger PI values were at a significantly increased risk of screw malposition in the TITS screw group (p = 0.049), with no association in the IS screw group. Logistic regression confirmed that a larger PI value was a significant risk factor for screw malposition in the TITS screw group (p = 0.010). The post-operative outcomes improved from poor/fair (at 6 months) to good/average (at 12 months) based on the Postel Merle d'Aubigné and Majeed scores, with no significant differences between subgroups.

Conclusions: Both percutaneous IS and TITS screw fixations are safe and effective treatments for posterior pelvic sacroiliac fractures. Due to the higher risk of screw malposition in patients with larger PI values, it is crucial to identify potential patients at risk when performing TITS screw fixation surgery.

Level of evidence: Level III.

Keywords: Iliosacral screw; Pelvic fracture; Pelvic incidence; Trans-iliac trans-sacral screw.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest for this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A With larger PI values, a greater fluoroscope cephalad tilt and a more horizontal projector placement were required. However, it was difficult to steer the fluoroscope to an appropriate angle of trajectory to get an optimal and clear pelvic outlet image due to hindrance from the radiolucent table or the patient’s thigh. When setting the pelvic inlet projection, the beamer of the single-arm fluoroscopic intensifier had to be aligned more perpendicularly with respect to the patient. The radiation could pass through excessive abdominal and buttock fat and bowel flatus, which could further interfere with and degrade the resolution of the images. B With smaller PI values, it is easier to position the fluoroscope to project the appropriate cephalad and caudal tilt angles. Solid ine caudad tilt of the fluoroscope, dashed line cephalad tilt of the fluoroscope, dotted line ideal cephalad tilt of the fluoroscope, dashed-dotted line PI angle, PI pelvic incidence
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A TITS screw placement at the S2 level was successfully executed along the intended projection. B, C A TITS screw placed at the S2 level was found to be malpositioned within the spinal canal. TITS trans-iliac trans-sacral

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grotz MR, Allami MK, Harwood P, et al. Open pelvic fractures: epidemiology, current concepts of management and outcome. Injury. 2005;36:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.05.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cullinane DC, Schiller HJ, Zielinski MD et al (2011) Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Practice Management guidelines for hemorrhage in pelvic fracture—update and systematic review. J Trauma 71:1850–1868. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823dca9a - PubMed
    1. Arvieux C, Thony F, Broux C et al (2012) Current management of severe pelvic and perineal trauma. J Visc Surg 149:e227–238. 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.06.004 - PubMed
    1. Kim WY. Treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries. Hip Pelvis. 2014;26:79–83. doi: 10.5371/hp.2014.26.2.79. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bi C, Wang Q, Wu J, et al. Modified pedicle screw-rod fixation versus anterior pelvic external fixation for the management of anterior pelvic ring fractures: a comparative study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12:185. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0688-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed