Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 6:14:1248867.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1248867. eCollection 2023.

The future of affordable cancer immunotherapy

Affiliations
Review

The future of affordable cancer immunotherapy

Niels Schaft et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

The treatment of cancer was revolutionized within the last two decades by utilizing the mechanism of the immune system against malignant tissue in so-called cancer immunotherapy. Two main developments boosted cancer immunotherapy: 1) the use of checkpoint inhibitors, which are characterized by a relatively high response rate mainly in solid tumors; however, at the cost of serious side effects, and 2) the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, which were shown to be very efficient in the treatment of hematologic malignancies, but failed to show high clinical effectiveness in solid tumors until now. In addition, active immunization against individual tumors is emerging, and the first products have reached clinical approval. These new treatment options are very cost-intensive and are not financially compensated by health insurance in many countries. Hence, strategies must be developed to make cancer immunotherapy affordable and to improve the cost-benefit ratio. In this review, we discuss the following strategies: 1) to leverage the antigenicity of "cold tumors" with affordable reagents, 2) to use microbiome-based products as markers or therapeutics, 3) to apply measures that make adoptive cell therapy (ACT) cheaper, e.g., the use of off-the-shelf products, 4) to use immunotherapies that offer cheaper platforms, such as RNA- or peptide-based vaccines and vaccines that use shared or common antigens instead of highly personal antigens, 5) to use a small set of predictive biomarkers instead of the "sequence everything" approach, and 6) to explore affordable immunohistochemistry markers that may direct individual therapies.

Keywords: RNA-based vaccines; adoptive cell therapy; affordable; biomarkers; immunohistochemistry; immunotherapy; microbiome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Factors that contribute to the high costs of individualized medicinal products and possibilities for cost reduction. The production of cellular therapeutics usually takes place on a per-patient basis, i.e. each patient requires a personal small-scale production of the individualized medicinal product in a specialized facility under labor-intensive documentation. Source materials are usually patient-derived living cells, which increases the logistic effort. Next generation sequencing and other omics data are exploited to define individual antigens, which are synthesized in a personalized manner. Alternatively, therapeutic components could be produced at larger scale, increasing the economic efficiency, creating a warehouse of constituents. Using individual patient data, possibly exploited with the help of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to identify a manageable set of informative markers, an individual combination of these elements is selected to generate the individualized product. When possible, truly individual components are avoided or reduced to a minimum, including patient-derived cells. To improve the efficiency of the treatment further, the in depth data analysis can propose the use of established thus cheaper drugs in combination with the advanced individualized medicinal products. See the main text for further details. The Motifolio Scientific Illustration Toolkit was used for the generation of this figure.

References

    1. Yang L, Ning Q, Tang S-s. Recent advances and next breakthrough in immunotherapy for cancer treatment. J Immunol Res (2022) 2022:8052212. doi: 10.1155/2022/8052212 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Filin IY, Solovyeva VV, Kitaeva KV, Rutland CS, Rizvanov AA. Current trends in cancer immunotherapy. Biomedicines (2020) 8(12):621. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8120621 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Darvishi M, Tosan F, Nakhaei P, Manjili DA, Kharkouei SA, Alizadeh A, et al. Recent progress in cancer immunotherapy: Overview of current status and challenges. Pathol - Res Practice (2023) 241:154241. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2022.154241 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belluz J. The Nobel Prize is a reminder of the outrageous cost of curing cancer (2018). Available at: https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/10/1/17923720/immunotherapy-....
    1. Antrim A. Study finds total cost of care for CAR-T, post-treatment events can exceed $1 million. Cranbury, NJ, USA: Pharmacy Times; (2021). Available at: https://www.pharmacytimes.com/view/study-finds-total-cost-of-care-for-ca....

Publication types