Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 8;14(36):9664-9677.
doi: 10.1039/d3sc02658b. eCollection 2023 Sep 20.

Why surface hydrophobicity promotes CO2 electroreduction: a case study of hydrophobic polymer N-heterocyclic carbenes

Affiliations

Why surface hydrophobicity promotes CO2 electroreduction: a case study of hydrophobic polymer N-heterocyclic carbenes

Qiang Luo et al. Chem Sci. .

Abstract

We report the use of polymer N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) to control the microenvironment surrounding metal nanocatalysts, thereby enhancing their catalytic performance in CO2 electroreduction. Three polymer NHC ligands were designed with different hydrophobicity: hydrophilic poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO-NHC), hydrophobic polystyrene (PS-NHC), and amphiphilic block copolymer (BCP) (PEO-b-PS-NHC). All three polymer NHCs exhibited enhanced reactivity of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) during CO2 electroreduction by suppressing proton reduction. Notably, the incorporation of hydrophobic PS segments in both PS-NHC and PEO-b-PS-NHC led to a twofold increase in the partial current density for CO formation, as compared to the hydrophilic PEO-NHC. While polymer ligands did not hinder ion diffusion, their hydrophobicity altered the localized hydrogen bonding structures of water. This was confirmed experimentally and theoretically through attenuated total reflectance surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulation, demonstrating improved CO2 diffusion and subsequent reduction in the presence of hydrophobic polymers. Furthermore, NHCs exhibited reasonable stability under reductive conditions, preserving the structural integrity of AuNPs, unlike thiol-ended polymers. The combination of NHC binding motifs with hydrophobic polymers provides valuable insights into controlling the microenvironment of metal nanocatalysts, offering a bioinspired strategy for the design of artificial metalloenzymes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Synthesis of three Im-terminated polymer ligands, including PEO44–Im (P1), PS100–Im (P2), PEO44-b-PS230–Im (P3), and molecular BMB–Im.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1. (a) CVs of Au/C with different polymer ligands measured in N2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 with a scan rate of 100 mV s−1. (b) ECSAs of AuNPs modified with various ligands. (c) and (d) CV curves of AuNPs (c) and Au–P3 (d) under N2 (black) and CO2 (red). (e) and (f) LSV curves measured in CO2-saturated 0.1 M KHCO3 at a scan rate of 10 mV s−1 normalized to (e) geometric area of electrodes and (f) ECSA of AuNPs.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Electrocatalytic performance of CO2 reduction on different catalysts: FE, (partial) current density and product ratio (ordered vertically) using pure Au (a)–(c), Au–P1 (d)–(f), Au–P2 (g)–(i) and Au–P3 (j)–(l). All tests were carried out in CO2 saturated 0.1 M KHCO3.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. (a) Scheme of BMB–Im and PEO–NHC modified AuNPs through Au–C binding. Catalytic selectivity to CO and H2 using Au–BMB–Im (b) and Au–NHC–PEO (c). (d) Product ratio and (e) current density analysis of Au–BMB–Im and Au–NHC–PEO.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Infrared spectroscopical study of Au electrodes with polymer NHC ligands. (a) CV scans in N2 saturated 0.1 M KHCO3 and (b) in situ ATR-SEIRAS spectra obtained at −0.3 VRHE of AuNPs and Au–NHC–PS-b-PEO, respectively. In situ ATR-SEIRAS spectra and vibrational peak intensity study for Au–NHC–PS-b-PEO (c) and (d) and pure AuNPs (e) and (f) in CO2-purged 0.1 M KHCO3 under various reductive potentials. The spectra in (c) and (e) are background subtracted at 0 V.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Interfacial diffusive properties of all catalysts. (a) CV scans of AuNPs and (b) Au–P3 measured with 50 mM K3Fe(CN)6 at various scan rates. (c) Linear relationship between peak current (Ip) and the square root of scan rates for pure Au and Au–P3. (d) Summary of diffusion coefficient (D) using various probe molecules including Fe(CN)63−, Ru(NH3)63+, Fc–COOH, and CO2.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. (a) Illustration of the simulation setup, with the Au, C, N, O, H atoms represented in yellow, grey, blue, red, and white, respectively; (b) density profiles as a function of z coordinates, with water and CO2 shown in blue and red; (c) Ow–Ow radial distribution function, analyzed for water molecules above z = 11.8 nm (bulk region, blue) and those below z = 11.8 nm (polymer layer, red).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Stability measurement using it curves (a), current retention (b) and ECSA (c). The experiments were carried out using constant-potential electrolysis at −1.0 V for 1 h. TEM images of pure Au (d) and Au–P3 (e) loaded on carbon before (top) and after (bottom) CO2 electroreduction for 1 h. All scale bars are 40 nm.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. In situ ATR-SEIRAS spectra of surface polymer modified electrode demonstrating the chemical stability of NHC ligands to counterpart thiol ligands. In situ ATR-SEIRAS spectra of (a) Au–NHC–PS-b-PEO and (b) Au–SH–PS267-b-PEO44 at −0.8 V on Au film electrode in CO2 saturated 0.1 M KHCO3 electrolyte. (c) The desorption vibrational peak intensity at 2924 cm−1 against reaction time. (d) The adsorption peak intensity of different electrodes after electrocatalysis under −0.8 V. Blue: Au–P3, red: Au–SH; dark: Au film.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yin Z. Palmore G. T. R. Sun S. Trends Chem. 2019;1:739–750. doi: 10.1016/j.trechm.2019.05.004. - DOI
    1. Yin Z. Yu J. Xie Z. Yu S.-W. Zhang L. Akauola T. Chen J. G. Huang W. Qi L. Zhang S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:20931–20938. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c09773. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gao D. Arán-Ais R. M. Jeon H. S. Roldan Cuenya B. Nat. Catal. 2019;2:198–210. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0235-5. - DOI
    1. Li S. Nagarajan A. V. Alfonso D. R. Sun M. Kauffman D. R. Mpourmpakis G. Jin R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60:6351–6356. doi: 10.1002/anie.202016129. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li S. Nagarajan A. V. Du X. Li Y. Liu Z. Kauffman D. R. Mpourmpakis G. Jin R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022;61:e202211771. doi: 10.1002/anie.202211771. - DOI - PubMed