Increasing the transparency of systematic reviews: presenting a generalized registration form
- PMID: 37736736
- PMCID: PMC10514995
- DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02281-7
Increasing the transparency of systematic reviews: presenting a generalized registration form
Abstract
This paper presents a generalized registration form for systematic reviews that can be used when currently available forms are not adequate. The form is designed to be applicable across disciplines (i.e., psychology, economics, law, physics, or any other field) and across review types (i.e., scoping review, review of qualitative studies, meta-analysis, or any other type of review). That means that the reviewed records may include research reports as well as archive documents, case law, books, poems, etc. Items were selected and formulated to optimize broad applicability instead of specificity, forgoing some benefits afforded by a tighter focus. This PRISMA 2020 compliant form is a fallback for more specialized forms and can be used if no specialized form or registration platform is available. When accessing this form on the Open Science Framework website, users will therefore first be guided to specialized forms when they exist. In addition to this use case, the form can also serve as a starting point for creating registration forms that cater to specific fields or review types.
Keywords: Preregistration; Registration; Systematic review; Transparency.
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
DTM and NP work for the Center of Open Science, the organization that hosts this registration on their website at
References
-
- The Open Science Framework. https://osf.io. Accessed 2 May 2023.
-
- Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):W65–94. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006. - PubMed
-
- Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–269. 10.1136/bmj.b2535. - PubMed
-
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. 2021;88: 105906. 10.1136/bmj.n71. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources