Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;31(12):5962-5969.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07570-1. Epub 2023 Sep 22.

The V angle compliments radiographic assessment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations by differentiating between Rockwood types III versus V and by considering dynamic horizontal translation in coronal radiographs

Philipp Vetter  1 , Larissa Eckl  2 , Frederik Bellmann  2 , Philipp Moroder  2 , Laurent Audigé  2 , Markus Scheibel  2   3
Affiliations

The V angle compliments radiographic assessment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations by differentiating between Rockwood types III versus V and by considering dynamic horizontal translation in coronal radiographs

Philipp Vetter et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations are usually graded radiographically according to Rockwood, but differentiation between Rockwood types III and V may be ambiguous. The potentially clinically relevant horizontal instability is barely addressed in coronal radiographs. It was hypothesized that a new radiologic parameter (V angle) would complement ACJ diagnostics on anteroposterior radiographs by differentiating between cases of Rockwood III and V while also considering the aspect of dynamic horizontal translation (DHT).

Methods: Ninety-five patients with acute ACJ dislocations (Rockwood types III and V) were included retrospectively between 2017 and 2020. On anteroposterior views (weightbearing: n = 62, non-weight-bearing: n = 33), the coracoclavicular (CC) distance and the newly introduced V angle for assessing scapular orientation were measured bilaterally. This angle is referenced between the spinal column and a line crossing the superior scapular angle and the crossing point between the supraspinatus fossa and the medial base of the coracoid process, reported as the side-comparative difference (non-injured side *minus* injured side). DHT on Alexander views was divided into stable, partially unstable or completely unstable.

Results: The V angle on the injured side alone (mean 50.0°; 95% confidence interval (CI), 48.6°-51.3°) showed no correlation with the side-comparative CC distance [%] (r = - 0.040; n.s.). Thus, the V angle on the non-injured side was considered, displaying a normal distribution (n.s.) with a mean of 58.0° (95% CI, 56.6°-59.4°). The side-comparative V angle showed a correlation with the side-comparative CC distance (r = 0.83; p < 0.001) and was able to differentiate between Rockwood types III (4.7°; 95% CI, 3.9°-5.5°; n = 39) and V (10.3°; 95% CI, 9.7°-11.0°; n = 56) (p < 0.001). A cut-off value of 7° had a 94.6% sensitivity and an 82.1% specificity (area under curve, AUC: 0.954; 95% CI, 0.915-0.994). The side-comparative V angle was greater for cases with complete DHT (8.7°; 95% CI, 7.9°-9.5°; n = 78) than for cases with partial DHT (4.8°; 95% CI, 3.3°-6.3°; n = 16) (p < 0.001). A cut-off value of 5° showed a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 66.7% (AUC 0.824; 95% CI, 0.725-0.924).

Conclusion: The scapular-based V angle on anteroposterior radiographs distinguishes between Rockwood types III and V as well as cases with partial or complete DHT.

Study design: Diagnostic study.

Level of evidence: Level II.

Keywords: Acromioclavicular joint dislocation; Scapula; V angle.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alexander OM (1954) Radiography of the acromioclavicular articulation. Med Radiogr Photogr 30(2):34–39 - PubMed
    1. Azar F, Pfeifer C, Alt V, Pregler B, Weiss I, Mayr A et al (2019) Clavicle elevation or shoulder girdle depression in acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a radiological investigation. Orthop J Sports Med 7(11):2325967119879927 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Boström Windhamre H, von Heideken J, Une-Larsson V, Ekström W, Ekelund A (2022) No difference in clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up in patients with type III and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with hook plate or physiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 31(6):1122–1136 - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Rooij PP, Van Lieshout EMM, Schurink IJ, Verhofstad MHJ, ACJ Injury Study Group (2021) Current practice in the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocations; a national survey in the Netherlands. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 47(5):1417–1427 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39(2):175–191 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms