A survey of preferences for respiratory support in the intensive care unit for patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure
- PMID: 37737652
- DOI: 10.1111/aas.14317
A survey of preferences for respiratory support in the intensive care unit for patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure
Erratum in
-
Correction to 'A survey of preferences for respiratory support in the intensive care unit for patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure'.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Mar;68(3):441. doi: 10.1111/aas.14385. Epub 2024 Feb 16. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024. PMID: 38362820 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: When caring for mechanically ventilated adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF), clinicians are faced with an uncertain choice between ventilator modes allowing for spontaneous breaths or ventilation fully controlled by the ventilator. The preferences of clinicians managing such patients, and what motivates their choice of ventilator mode, are largely unknown. To better understand how clinicians' preferences may impact the choice of ventilatory support for patients with AHRF, we issued a survey to an international network of intensive care unit (ICU) researchers.
Methods: We distributed an online survey with 32 broadly similar and interlinked questions on how clinicians prioritise spontaneous or controlled ventilation in invasively ventilated patients with AHRF of different severity, and which factors determine their choice.
Results: The survey was distributed to 1337 recipients in 12 countries. Of these, 415 (31%) completed the survey either fully (52%) or partially (48%). Most respondents were identified as medical specialists (87%) or physicians in training (11%). Modes allowing for spontaneous ventilation were considered preferable in mild AHRF, with controlled ventilation considered as progressively more important in moderate and severe AHRF. Among respondents there was strong support (90%) for a randomised clinical trial comparing spontaneous with controlled ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF.
Conclusions: The responses from this international survey suggest that there is clinical equipoise for the preferred ventilator mode in patients with AHRF of moderate severity. We found strong support for a randomised trial comparing modes of ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF.
Keywords: acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure; acute respiratory distress syndrome; controlled ventilation; invasive mechanical ventilation; spontaneous ventilation; survey.
© 2023 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.
Similar articles
-
Epidemiology of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units during 2005-2022. A binational, registry-based study.Intensive Care Med. 2024 Nov;50(11):1861-1872. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07609-y. Epub 2024 Sep 2. Intensive Care Med. 2024. PMID: 39222135 Free PMC article.
-
Multicentre, randomised trial to investigate early nasal high-flow therapy in paediatric acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial-a Paediatric Acute respiratory Intervention Study (PARIS 2).BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 18;9(12):e030516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030516. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31857300 Free PMC article.
-
Patient characteristics, management and outcomes in a Nordic subset of the "large observational study to understand the global impact of severe acute respiratory failure" (LUNG SAFE) study.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Jul;66(6):684-695. doi: 10.1111/aas.14069. Epub 2022 May 12. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022. PMID: 35398892 Free PMC article.
-
Non-invasive ventilatory support and high-flow nasal oxygen as first-line treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS.Intensive Care Med. 2021 Aug;47(8):851-866. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06459-2. Epub 2021 Jul 7. Intensive Care Med. 2021. PMID: 34232336 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Helmet noninvasive ventilation in acute hypoxic respiratory failure.Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023 Feb 1;29(1):8-13. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001008. Epub 2022 Dec 9. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023. PMID: 36580369 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Bedside Assessment of the Respiratory System During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 7;13(23):7456. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237456. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39685913 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation: a nationwide survey among intensive care units in the Netherlands.BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Jul 21;12(1):e002868. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002868. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025. PMID: 40695529 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Gorman EA, O'Kane CM, McAuley DF. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: diagnosis, outcomes, long-term sequelae, and management. Lancet. 2022;400:1157-1170.
-
- Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315:788-800.
-
- Claesson J, Freundlich M, Gunnarsson I, et al. Mechanical ventilation in ARDS. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59:286-297.
-
- Fan E, Sorbo LD, Goligher EC, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine clinical practice guideline: mechanical ventilation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195:1253-1263.
-
- Griffiths MJD, McAuley DF, Perkins GD, et al. Guidelines on the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019;6:e000420.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical