Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 1;30(Pt 6):1114-1126.
doi: 10.1107/S1600577523006926. Epub 2023 Sep 22.

Laboratory-based X-ray spectrometer for actinide science

Affiliations

Laboratory-based X-ray spectrometer for actinide science

Daniil Novichkov et al. J Synchrotron Radiat. .

Abstract

X-ray absorption and emission spectroscopies nowadays are advanced characterization methods for fundamental and applied actinide research. One of the advantages of these methods is to reveal slight changes in the structural and electronic properties of radionuclides. The experiments are generally carried out at synchrotrons. However, considerable progress has been made to construct laboratory-based X-ray spectrometers for X-ray absorption and emission spectroscopies. Laboratory spectrometers are reliable, effective and accessible alternatives to synchrotrons, especially for actinide research, which allow dispensing with high costs of the radioactive sample transport and synchrotron time. Moreover, data from laboratory spectrometers, obtained within a reasonable time, are comparable with synchrotron results. Thereby, laboratory spectrometers can complement synchrotrons or can be used for preliminary experiments to find perspective samples for synchrotron experiments with better resolution. Here, the construction and implementation of an X-ray spectrometer (LomonosovXAS) in Johann-geometry at a radiochemistry laboratory is reported. Examples are given of the application of LomonosovXAS to actinide systems relevant to the chemistry of f-elements, the physical chemistry of nuclear power engineering and the long-term disposal of spent nuclear fuel.

Keywords: X-ray absorption spectroscopy; X-ray emission spectroscopy; X-ray spectrometers; laboratory-based.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the laboratory X-ray spectrometer for XES and XAS modes, as well as a photograph of the spectrometer in the XAS configuration. In the absorption mode the sample can be both on the detector and on the X-ray tube, while in XES mode the position of the sample remains fixed. SBCA: spherically bent crystal analyser.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CAD model of the X-ray spectrometer with X-ray tube, crystal-monochromator and detector.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) CAD model of the security module, in which the left-hand part of the figure shows the separated parts in the assembly, and the right-hand part is a sectional view of the introductory labyrinth type channel. (b) Helium chamber. (c) Simulations of X-ray beam transmission through the air and helium.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Comparison of the Mn K-edge XANES spectra of Mn2O3 collected by the laboratory spectrometer (red) and synchrotron radiation (blue, measured on the STM beamline of the Kurchatov Scientific Center). (b) K-edge XANES on manganese oxides. (c) Oscillating parts and Fourier transforms of X-ray spectra of Mn2O3. (d) Fourier transforms of X-ray spectra of Mn2O3.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of the experimental XANES spectra of UO2, ThO2, NpO2 + and PuO2 2+, recorded at the U L 3-, Th L 3-, Np L 3- and Pu L 3-edges, respectively, with help of the laboratory spectrometer (red) and at the synchrotron (blue).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Experimental U Lα1, Th Lα1, Pt Lα1, Fe Kα1 and Kα2 data recorded on (a) UO2, (b) ThO2, (c) Pt-metal and (d) Fe-metal, respectively.

References

    1. Amidani, L., Plakhova, T. V., Romanchuk, A. Y., Gerber, E., Weiss, S., Efimenko, A., Sahle, C. J., Butorin, S. M., Kalmykov, S. N. & Kvashnina, K. O. (2019). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 10635–10643. - PubMed
    1. Bearden, J. A. & Burr, A. F. (1967). Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 125–142.
    1. Bergmann, U. & Cramer, S. P. (1998). Proc. SPIE, 3448, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.332507.
    1. Bès, R., Ahopelto, T., Honkanen, A. P., Huotari, S., Leinders, G., Pakarinen, J. & Kvashnina, K. (2018). J. Nucl. Mater. 507, 50–53.
    1. Bes, R., Takala, S. & Huotari, S. (2021). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92, 043106. - PubMed