Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;4(10):e822-e829.
doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00169-6. Epub 2023 Sep 19.

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra on contaminated liquid cultures for tuberculosis and rifampicin-resistance detection: a diagnostic accuracy evaluation

Affiliations

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra on contaminated liquid cultures for tuberculosis and rifampicin-resistance detection: a diagnostic accuracy evaluation

Yonas T Ghebrekristos et al. Lancet Microbe. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) is a widely used rapid front-line tuberculosis and rifampicin-susceptibility testing. Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960 liquid culture is used as an adjunct but is vulnerable to contamination. We aimed to assess whether Ultra can be used on to-be-discarded contaminated cultures.

Methods: We stored contaminated MGIT960 tubes (growth-positive, acid-fast bacilli [AFB]-negative) originally inoculated at a high-volume laboratory in Cape Town, South Africa, to diagnose patients with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis. Patients who had no positive tuberculosis results (smear, Ultra, or culture) at contamination detection and had another, later specimen submitted within 3 months of the contaminated specimen were selected. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of Ultra on contaminated growth from the first culture for tuberculosis (next-available non-contaminated culture result reference standard) and rifampicin resistance (vs MTBDRplus on a later isolate). We calculated potential time-to-diagnosis improvements and also evaluated the immunochromatographic MPT64 TBc assay.

Findings: Between June 1 and Aug 31, 2019, 36 684 specimens from 26 929 patients were processed for diagnostic culture. 2402 (7%) cultures from 2186 patients were contaminated. 1068 (49%) of 2186 patients had no other specimen submitted. After 319 exclusions, there were 799 people with at least one repeat specimen submitted; of these, we included in our study 246 patients (31%) with a culture-positive repeat specimen and 429 patients (54%) with a culture-negative repeat specimen. 124 patients (16%) with a culture-contaminated repeat specimen were excluded. When Ultra was done on the initial contaminated growth, sensitivity was 89% (95% CI 84-94) for tuberculosis and 95% (75-100) for rifampicin-resistance detection, and specificity was 95% (90-98) for tuberculosis and 98% (93-100) for rifampicin-resistance detection. If our approach were used the day after contamination detection, the time to tuberculosis detection would improve by a median of 23 days (IQR 13-45) and provide a result in many patients who had none. MPT64 TBc had a sensitivity of 5% (95% CI 0-25).

Interpretation: Ultra on AFB-negative growth from contaminated MGIT960 tubes had high sensitivity and specificity, approximating WHO criteria for sputum test target product performance and exceeding drug susceptibility testing. Our approach could mitigate negative effects of culture contamination, especially when repeat specimens are not submitted.

Funding: The European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, National Institutes of Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests GT reports funding from the EDCTP2 programme supported by the EU (RIA2018D-2509, PreFIT; RIA2018D-2493, SeroSelectTB; RIA2020I-3305, CAGE-TB) and the National Institutes of Health (D43TW010350; U01AI152087; U54EB027049; R01AI136894). RW reports funding from the South African Medical Research Council. All other authors report no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Study profile
AFB=acid-fast bacilli. Ultra=GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra. *Contaminated cultures were consecutively selected for Ultra based on their later culture result (not all eligible contaminated cultures were tested as detailed in the Methods). If patients had more than one contaminated culture, the earliest-available contaminated culture was selected for Ultra (hence one contaminated culture was tested per patient).
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Predictive values of Ultra
(A) Predictive value of Ultra on AFB-negative, contaminated MGIT960 growth as a function of frequency of tuberculosis (ie, the proportion of patients with an initial culture-contaminated specimen and a later culture-positive specimen); the grey area indicates the observed frequency (36%, 95% CI 33–40); at a frequency of 18%, half of that observed in this cohort (indicated by the black dashed vertical line), Ultra’s PPV is 80%, increasing to 91% with trace exclusion or 95% with trace reclassification strategies, approximating or exceeding that of Ultra on sputum. The curves for NPV and NPV (trace excluded) cannot be readily distinguished because they are almost identical. (B) Predictive value of Ultra on contaminated growth as a function of frequency of rifampicin-resistance (ie, the proportion of patients with an initial culture-contaminated specimen and a later culture-positive, rifampicin-resistant isolate); the grey area indicates the observed frequency (16%, 95% CI 10–23); at the observed frequency, Ultra’s PPV for rifampicin-resistance is 90%, approximating that of Ultra on sputum. (C) Predictive value of Ultra on sputum according to WHO estimates as a function of the proportion of patients with tuberculosis or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis; at a frequency of 19%, Ultra’s PPV is 84% for tuberculosis and 96% for rifampicin resistance. AFB=acid-fast bacillus. NPV=negative predictive value. PPV=positive predictive value. Ultra=Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. Concept map
The concept map shows the timeline from the date of initial specimen collection (A) to when it arrives at the laboratory for processing (B) and when it is reported as contaminated (C). At this point, where indicated by the upper vertical arrow, substantial care cascade loss occurs due to a repeat specimen not being submitted. This loss, and the subsequent delays to await collection of another specimen (if received at all; D), deliver to the laboratory (E), and culture the sample (F) could be minimised if the Ultra on contaminated culture approach were applied (bottom vertical arrow) All day values are median (IQR). Ultra=Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra.

References

    1. Chakravorty S, Simmons AM, Rowneki M, et al. The new Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: improving detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and resistance to rifampin in an assay suitable for point-of-care testing. mBio 2017; 8: e00812–17 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dorman SE, Schumacher SG, Alland D, et al. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance: a prospective multicentre diagnostic accuracy study. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18: 76–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO. WHO meeting report of a technical expert consultation: non-inferiority analysis of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra compared to Xpert MTB/RIF. 2017. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254792/WHO-HTM-TB-20?se... (accessed Feb 28, 2023).
    1. WHO. WHO operational handbook on tuberculosis, module 3 diagnosis, rapid diagnostics for tuberculosis detection. 2021. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/342369 (accessed Feb 28, 2023).
    1. Department of Health, Republic of South Africa. Symptom-based integrated approach to the adult in primary care. 2020. https://www.knowledgehub.org.za/system/files/elibdownloads/2020-08/APC%2... (accessed Feb 28, 2023).

Publication types

MeSH terms