Artificial intelligence as diagnostic aiding tool in cases of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3: the results of retrospective multi-center cohort study
- PMID: 37740046
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03989-9
Artificial intelligence as diagnostic aiding tool in cases of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3: the results of retrospective multi-center cohort study
Abstract
Purpose: To study the effect of artificial intelligence (AI) on the diagnostic performance of radiologists in interpreting prostate mpMRI images of the PI-RADS 3 category.
Methods: In this multicenter study, 16 radiologists were invited to interpret prostate mpMRI cases with and without AI. The study included a total of 87 cases initially diagnosed as PI-RADS 3 by radiologists without AI, with 28 cases being clinically significant cancers (csPCa) and 59 cases being non-csPCa. The study compared the diagnostic efficacy between readings without and with AI, the reading time, and confidence levels.
Results: AI changed the diagnosis in 65 out of 87 cases. Among the 59 non-csPCa cases, 41 were correctly downgraded to PI-RADS 1-2, and 9 were incorrectly upgraded to PI-RADS 4-5. For the 28 csPCa cases, 20 were correctly upgraded to PI-RADS 4-5, and 5 were incorrectly downgraded to PI-RADS 1-2. Radiologists assisted by AI achieved higher diagnostic specificity and accuracy than those without AI [0.695 vs 0.000 and 0.736 vs 0.322, both P < 0.001]. Sensitivity with AI was not significantly different from that without AI [0.821 vs 1.000, P = 1.000]. AI reduced reading time significantly compared to without AI (mean: 351 seconds, P < 0.001). The diagnostic confidence score with AI was significantly higher than that without AI (Cohen Kappa: -0.016).
Conclusion: With the help of AI, there was an improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of PI-RADS category 3 cases by radiologists. There is also an increase in diagnostic efficiency and diagnostic confidence.
Keywords: Deep learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; Prostatic neoplasms.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A, Global cancer statistics, 2012, CA Cancer J Clin, 2015, 65(2):87-108. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21262 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A, Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates, Eur Urol, 2020, 77(1):38-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Boustani AM, Pucar D, Saperstein L, Molecular imaging of prostate cancer, Br J Radiol, 2018, 91(1084):20170736. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170736 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Fütterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, Emberton M, Giannarini G, Kirkham A, et al. Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature, Eur Urol, 2015, 68(6):1045-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.013 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Klotz L, Chin J, Black PC, Finelli A, Anidjar M, Bladou F, et al. Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Transrectal Ultrasonography Biopsy for Biopsy-Naive Men at Risk for Prostate Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial, JAMA Oncol, 2021, 1;7(4):534-542. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7589 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
