Diffusion kurtosis imaging with multiple quantitative parameters for predicting microsatellite instability status of endometrial carcinoma
- PMID: 37740047
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04041-6
Diffusion kurtosis imaging with multiple quantitative parameters for predicting microsatellite instability status of endometrial carcinoma
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the value of Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) with multiple quantitative parameters in predicting microsatellite instability (MSI) status in endometrial carcinoma (EC).
Methods: Data of 38 patients with EC were retrospectively analyzed, including 12 MSI and 26 microsatellite stability (MSS). All patients underwent preoperative 1.5T MR examination. The quantitative values of the DKI sequence in the tumor parenchyma of the two groups, including mean kurtosis (MK), axial kurtosis (Ka), radial kurtosis (Kr), fractional anisotropy (FA), fractional anisotropy of kurtosis (FAk), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (Da), and radial diffusivity (Dr) were measured by two observers, respectively.
Results: The MK, Ka, Kr, FA, FAk, MD, Da, and Dr values of the MSI group were 1.074 ± 0.162, 1.253 ± 0.229, 0.886 ± 0.205, 0.207 ± 0.041, 0.397 ± 0.129, 0.890 ± 0.158 μm2/ms, 1.083 ± 0.218 μm2/ms, and 0.793 ± 0.133 μm2/ms, and 0.956 (0.889,1.002), 1.048 ± 0.211, 0.831 ± 0.099, 0.188 ± 0.061, 0.334 (0.241,0.410), 1.043 ± 0.217 μm2/ms, 1.235 ± 0.229 μm2/ms, and 0.946 ± 0.215 μm2/ms in the MSS group. The MK and Ka values of the MSI group were higher than those of the MSS group (P<0.05), while the MD and Dr values were lower than those of the MSS group (P<0.05). The AUC of MK, Ka, MD, and Dr values in predicting MSI status of EC was 0.763, 0.729, 0.731, 0.748, respectively. The sensitivity was 58.3%, 50.0%, 65.4%, 61.5%, and the specificity was 96.2%, 92.3%, 75.0%, 83.3%, respectively.
Conclusion: DKI can provide multiple quantitative parameters for predicting the MSI status of EC, and assist gynecologist to optimize the treatment plan for the patients.
Keywords: Diffusion kurtosis imaging; Endometrial carcinoma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Microsatellite instability.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
ZOOMit diffusion kurtosis imaging combined with diffusion weighted imaging for the assessment of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jun;50(6):2720-2731. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04720-y. Epub 2024 Dec 6. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025. PMID: 39641783
-
Evaluation of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis using tract-based spatial statistics analysis: diffusion kurtosis imaging.BMC Neurol. 2018 Aug 7;18(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1108-2. BMC Neurol. 2018. PMID: 30086721 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the renal mild tubulointerstitial damage and renal function in IgAN patients: a comparative study based on diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion tensor imaging.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Apr;48(4):1350-1362. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03822-3. Epub 2023 Feb 7. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023. PMID: 36749369
-
Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging mono-exponential mode with diffusion kurtosis imaging for predicting pathological grades of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Eur J Radiol. 2020 Sep;130:109195. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109195. Epub 2020 Jul 26. Eur J Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32763475
-
Differentiation of high-grade-astrocytomas from solitary-brain-metastases: Comparing diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion tensor imaging.Eur J Radiol. 2015 Dec;84(12):2618-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Oct 9. Eur J Radiol. 2015. PMID: 26482747
Cited by
-
ZOOMit diffusion kurtosis imaging combined with diffusion weighted imaging for the assessment of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jun;50(6):2720-2731. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04720-y. Epub 2024 Dec 6. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025. PMID: 39641783
-
Multi-model quantitative MRI of uterine cancers in precision medicine's era-a narrative review.Insights Imaging. 2025 May 28;16(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-01965-z. Insights Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40437300 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tamura K, Kaneda M, Futagawa M, Takeshita M, Kim S, Nakama M, Kawashita N, Tatsumi-Miyajima J (2019) Genetic and genomic basis of the mismatch repair system involved in Lynch syndrome. Int J Clin Oncol. Sep;24(9):999-1011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01494-y . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kane AM, Fennell LJ, Liu C, Borowsky J, McKeone DM, Bond CE, Kazakoff S, Patch AM, Koufariotis LT, Pearson J, Waddell N, Leggett BA, Whitehall VLJ (2020) Alterations in signaling pathways that accompany spontaneous transition to malignancy in a mouse model of BRAF mutant microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. Neoplasia. Feb;22(2):120-128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2019.12.002 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Greenberg A, Kariv R, Solar I, Hershkovitz D (2020) Geographic Heterogeneity for Mismatch Repair Proteins Is Associated with Defects in DNA Repair. Isr Med Assoc J. Jan;22(1):32-36. PMID: 31927803. - PubMed
-
- Brooks RA, Fleming GF, Lastra RR, Lee NK, Moroney JW, Son CH, Tatebe K, Veneris JL (2019) Current recommendations and recent progress in endometrial cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. Jul;69(4):258-279. doi: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21561 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wadee R, Grayson W (2019) A potpourri of pathogenetic pathways in endometrial carcinoma with a focus on Lynch Syndrome. Ann Diagn Pathol. Apr;39:92-104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2019.02.003 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous